Hi Colin,
Colin Fraizer writes:
> Wow, I think I'm an org pariah. Did my email violate some org cultural
> norm? :-)
Mhh.. maybe you're an "Org God", and thanks to Org your todo list is
already empty ;) Which might not be the case of people who may reply
to your email in depth. It's just one
Colin Fraizer writes:
> Wow, I think I'm an org pariah. Did my email violate some org cultural
> norm? :-)
Not that I'm aware of :)
>
> If so, I apologize.
>
> Anyone have strong feelings about whether a change like this is
> advisable?
This should probably go to Carsten and Nicolas since they
Wow, I think I'm an org pariah. Did my email violate some org cultural norm? :-)
If so, I apologize.
Anyone have strong feelings about whether a change like this is advisable?
On Feb 27, 2012, at 12:32 PM, "Colin Fraizer" wrote:
> The variable org-latex-regexps has an element
>
>("$" "\\
The variable org-latex-regexps has an element
("$" "\\([^$]\\|^\\)\\(\\(\\$\\([^
\r\n,;.$][^$\n\r]*?\\(\n[^$\n\r]*?\\)\\{0,2\\}[^
\r\n,.$]\\)\\$\\)\\)\\([- .,?;:'\")\000]\\|$\\)" 2 nil)
The 6th nested subexpression (starts with "\\([-") prevents conversion of
some latex math-mode stuff.
