Re: [O] performance of exporting large tables

2013-05-21 Thread D M German
Nicolas Goaziou twisted the bytes to say: Nicolas> Nicolas Goaziou writes: >> I am going to have a look at this. Nicolas> I pushed a commit caching the results of some table functions. Export of Nicolas> large tables should be a lot faster (I get 6 s now; it was 90 s before). Hi Nicolas

Re: [O] performance of exporting large tables

2013-05-18 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Nicolas Goaziou writes: > I am going to have a look at this. I pushed a commit caching the results of some table functions. Export of large tables should be a lot faster (I get 6 s now; it was 90 s before). Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou

Re: [O] performance of exporting large tables

2013-05-18 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, D M German writes: > Here is a trivial example: > > http://turingmachine.org/~dmg/temp/bigTable.org > > (you can do anything with this file, including adding it to any battery > of tests in the future). > > - Latex works well (export within a couple of seconds) > - ASCII, HTML, Markdown (

Re: [O] performance of exporting large tables

2013-05-17 Thread D M German
Hi Suvayu, Suvayu> Hi Daniel, Suvayu> On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 01:24:10PM -0700, D M German wrote: >> >> If interested, I can make the table available. Suvayu> A working example that reproduces the issue always helps. If you could Suvayu> post the table (of course after removing sensitive

Re: [O] performance of exporting large tables

2013-05-16 Thread Suvayu Ali
Hi Daniel, On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 01:24:10PM -0700, D M German wrote: > > If interested, I can make the table available. A working example that reproduces the issue always helps. If you could post the table (of course after removing sensitive/private information) it would be great help for the

[O] performance of exporting large tables

2013-05-16 Thread D M German
hi everybody, I have a table with 15 columns and 500 rows. One of the columns is a URL. org-mode is hanging while exporting the table. It does not seem to crash, but it is taking a significant amount of time. The worst part is that it does not appear to be linear. 80 rows -> 17 seconds 160 rows