Hello,
T.F. Torrey writes:
> Jambunathan K writes:
>
>> Meanwhile, someone should fix up the FSF assignment notice on those
>> files. As far as I am concerned, it is a routine housekeeping thing and
>> hasn't taken effect. I am not assigning any copyright to FSF.
>
> Section 1a of the copyrig
Jambunathan K writes:
> Meanwhile, someone should fix up the FSF assignment notice on those
> files. As far as I am concerned, it is a routine housekeeping thing and
> hasn't taken effect. I am not assigning any copyright to FSF.
Section 1a of the copyright assignment agreement is very specifi
Jambunathan K writes:
> Carsten Dominik writes:
>
>> We will see in how far the FSF will follow your arguments and what
>> will happen when we merge 8.0 into the Emacs distribution. So I don't
>> see a reason to hold up the 8.0 release. With respect to Emacs, we
>> will have time to resolve th
Check with Nicolas and see to what percentage he agrees with what is
shown down below as on that particular date.
Jay Kerns writes:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 3:11 AM, Achim Gratz wrote:
> [snip]
>
>> Nevertheless my suggestion to the Org community is to respect your wish
>> and move these
Carsten Dominik writes:
> We will see in how far the FSF will follow your arguments and what
> will happen when we merge 8.0 into the Emacs distribution. So I don't
> see a reason to hold up the 8.0 release. With respect to Emacs, we
> will have time to resolve the issue one way or another.
Me
>
> A child with Asperger’s syndrome may notice that a woman in the line at
> the supermarket checkout is obese, and remark, in his or her usual tone of
> voice and volume, that the lady is fat and needs to go on a diet. The
> child’s opinion is that she should be grateful for the observation and
>
Hi all,
there is no reason not to include ox-html.el and ox-odt.el into Org
8.0. As for their inclusion into Emacs, we will have time to sort
this out.
Thanks,
--
Bastien
Dear Carsten,
I certainly support your position. And if *anybody's* wishes should
be honoured, I would think yours should be at the top of that list,
along with the wishes of the other (at least) 4 copyright holders' of
ox-html.el.
Cheers,
Jay
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 4:58 AM, Carsten Dominik
On 11.3.2013, at 05:08, Jambunathan K wrote:
>
> Even if my combative positioning doesn't amount to anything much, I want
> to throw in a little friction by the way of Bastien and the current
> release. I am stating my purpose in no uncertain terms - yes it is to
> delay the release or cause co
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 3:11 AM, Achim Gratz wrote:
[snip]
> Nevertheless my suggestion to the Org community is to respect your wish
> and move these two files to contrib...
[snip]
I have to say I think Achim is really on the right track, here. Also
for those interested in a bit of historical
Jambunathan K writes:
> I would like to remove ox-html.el from Org distribution. My
> relationship with ox-html.el is a bit complicated and I am not sure how
> far I can go forward on this front.
Legal questions aside, which I'm not qualified to answer, here's a
german proverb:
"Geschenkt is ge
Aloha Jambunathan,
Jambunathan K writes:
>
> Even if my combative positioning doesn't amount to anything much, I want
> to throw in a little friction by the way of Bastien and the current
> release. I am stating my purpose in no uncertain terms - yes it is to
> delay the release or cause confus
Christopher Schmidt writes:
> Detlef Steuer writes:
>> But: The papers the FSF asked you to sign were constructed for exactly
>> this case I assume.
>
> That's not right.
>
> https://www.gnu.org/licenses/why-assign.html
>
> I am not a copyright lawyer. So is everyone else subscribed to this
On 11/03/13 06:30, Christopher Schmidt wrote:
Detlef Steuer writes:
But: The papers the FSF asked you to sign were constructed for exactly
this case I assume.
That's not right.
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/why-assign.html
I am not a copyright lawyer. So is everyone else subscribed to
Aloha Christopher,
Christopher Schmidt writes:
> #+BEGIN my2cents
> If Jambunathan does not want code he wrote to be part of Org any more,
> I'd respect his wish. At first sight this is a loss for Org. This
> does not need to be the end, though. GSoC is coming up, rewriting
> specific exporte
Detlef Steuer writes:
> But: The papers the FSF asked you to sign were constructed for exactly
> this case I assume.
That's not right.
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/why-assign.html
I am not a copyright lawyer. So is everyone else subscribed to this
list. The FSF's copyright clerk should as
Am 10.03.2013 19:55, schrieb Detlef Steuer:
I am willing to go as far is humanly possible for me to have my
displeasure registered.
Dear Jambunathan,
your displeasure is very well registered by the hundreds or even
thousands of readers of this list.
It is very sad to see an obviously very
> I am willing to go as far is humanly possible for me to have my
> displeasure registered.
>
Dear Jambunathan,
your displeasure is very well registered by the hundreds or even
thousands of readers of this list.
It is very sad to see an obviously very gifted and energetic programmer
going in
I would like to remove ox-html.el from Org distribution. My
relationship with ox-html.el is a bit complicated and I am not sure how
far I can go forward on this front.
I am willing to go as far is humanly possible for me to have my
displeasure registered.
--
19 matches
Mail list logo
