Hi all,
Carsten Dominik writes:
> How about introducing another flag for the formula to turn
> on time string processing like this?
I've implemented this.
You can now use the "T" flag to compute durations:
| Task 1 | Task 2 | Total |
|++-|
| 35:00 | 35:00 | 1:10:0
>> If we're not just looking for a neat workaround for some special cases
>> anymore, but looking at making org-tables aware of time-like strings
>> by default, a better strategy than to convert them into integers might
>> be to translate them into Calc time format and back again.
>>
>> After a
Christian Moe writes:
> Hi,
>
> If we're not just looking for a neat workaround for some special cases
> anymore, but looking at making org-tables aware of time-like strings
> by default, a better strategy than to convert them into integers might
> be to translate them into Calc time format an
On 22.3.2011, at 05:40, Eric Schulte wrote:
>>
>> While this topic is raised, would it make sense for Org-mode table
>> formula to automatically parse any time-like string into time units
>> (i.e., base sixty). That would be the easiest for most users, and (I
>> imagine) would rarely result in
Hi,
If we're not just looking for a neat workaround for some special cases
anymore, but looking at making org-tables aware of time-like strings
by default, a better strategy than to convert them into integers might
be to translate them into Calc time format and back again.
After all, Calc an
>
> While this topic is raised, would it make sense for Org-mode table
> formula to automatically parse any time-like string into time units
> (i.e., base sixty). That would be the easiest for most users, and (I
> imagine) would rarely result in surprising and unexpected behavior.
>
So, I took a
Christian Moe writes:
> Hi,
>
> Returning to this thread:
>
> 1. I love Eric's macro wrapper idea -- now time arithmetic in tables
> gets truly manageable. If it's not included into Org-mode, it's a must
> for Worg!
>
Great, if no Org-mode changes result, then I will certainly post this
code up
Hi,
Returning to this thread:
1. I love Eric's macro wrapper idea -- now time arithmetic in tables
gets truly manageable. If it's not included into Org-mode, it's a must
for Worg!
2. There's duplication with org-timer-hms-to-secs and
org-timer-secs-to-hms. (Cf. my
http://permalink.gmane.or
"Eric Schulte" writes:
> I wrapped Bastien's functions below in a simple macro, which IMO results
> in a very nice way to handle time values in Org-mode tables as in the
> attached org file (below).
>
> Note, the first argument to the `with-time' macro controls whether
> results are returned as a
I wrapped Bastien's functions below in a simple macro, which IMO results
in a very nice way to handle time values in Org-mode tables as shown
below.
Note, the first argument to the `with-time' macro controls whether
results are returned as a time string or a numerical value. That
argument may be
I wrapped Bastien's functions below in a simple macro, which IMO results
in a very nice way to handle time values in Org-mode tables as in the
attached org file (below).
Note, the first argument to the `with-time' macro controls whether
results are returned as a time string or a numerical value.
Hi Martin,
Martin Halder writes:
> this is fantastic, already love lisp, thanks a lot.. now I have exactly
> what I wanted.. additionally I needed the time format in industrial mode
> (1h = 100m = 100s), implemented in ihms.
thanks for these functions -- I allowed myself to add them to
Worg/org
Christian Moe writes:
> Hi,
>
> This is ingenious! But I have a different solution that borrows
> conversion functions from org-timer.el.
[...]
Your solution is perfect. Simple and leverages the built-in functions
from org. Thanks for this.
--
: Eric S Fraga (GnuPG: 0xC89193D8FFFCF67D) in
Hi Christian,
this is fantastic, already love lisp, thanks a lot.. now I have exactly what I
wanted.. additionally I needed the time format in industrial mode (1h = 100m =
100s), implemented in ihms.
Thanks,
Martin
| Date | Start | Lunch | Back | End | Sum | Ind |
|---
Hi,
This is ingenious! But I have a different solution that borrows
conversion functions from org-timer.el.
To avoid an insanely long formula, I'll alias those functions with
shorter names which don't seem to colide with anything in my Emacs.
#+begin_src emacs-lisp
(defun sec (arg)
(o
Martin Halder writes:
[...]
> Hi Eric,
>
> yes and thanks for the previous help, too.. the good old printf.. I
> would like to pass the result of time() directly to a lisp function,
> like:
> #+TBLFM: $6='(coolfunc (time(...$5)-time(...$4)))
>
> If I would know how to pass the result, eg as a st
>> I was trying to generate a simple table with time format "hh:mm" and
>> auto calculate daily sum.. clocking working time was too much so I
>> thought this would be easy but ended up with the following.. it works
>> but is not beautiful (apply formula twice and same information
>> multiple times
Martin Halder writes:
> Hi all,
>
> some words of warning: this was written by an Emacs, Org, Lisp and
> Calc newbie.. and congratulations on converting a vim user btw, org
> mode is great : )
>
> I was trying to generate a simple table with time format "hh:mm" and
> auto calculate daily sum.. cl
Hi all,
some words of warning: this was written by an Emacs, Org, Lisp and Calc
newbie.. and congratulations on converting a vim user btw, org mode is great : )
I was trying to generate a simple table with time format "hh:mm" and auto
calculate daily sum.. clocking working time was too much so
19 matches
Mail list logo
