Hi!
* Michael Brand wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Karl Voit wrote:
>> I assume, there is a misunderstanding.
>
> Yes there was. With your clean example I understand now.
Sorry that I was not able to describe the issue in the first place.
>> [your example]
>>
>> Does this make any
Hi Karl
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Karl Voit wrote:
> I assume, there is a misunderstanding.
Yes there was. With your clean example I understand now.
> [your example]
>
> Does this make any sense for you?
Yes, it absolutely does. Only that someone would have to implement the
missing funct
Hi Michael!
* Michael Brand wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Karl Voit wrote:
>> What about alternating data (no summary value at bottom row) and
>> evaluation columns?
>>
>> | Data 1 | Eval 1 | Data 2 | Eval 2 |
>>
>> What about moving columns:
>>
>> Switching two columns from:
>> |
Hi Karl
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Karl Voit wrote:
> What about alternating data (no summary value at bottom row) and
> evaluation columns?
>
> | Data 1 | Eval 1 | Data 2 | Eval 2 |
>
> What about moving columns:
>
> Switching two columns from:
> | Eval 1 | Eval 2 | foo | bar |
> to:
> | E
* Michael Brand wrote:
> Hi Karl
Hi Michael!
> On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 9:56 PM, Karl Voit wrote:
>> | *Option* | *Evaluation 123* | *Evaluation 234* |
>> |--+--+--|
>> | Option 1 | 27 | 26 |
>> | Option 2 | 22 |
Hi Karl
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 9:56 PM, Karl Voit wrote:
> | *Option* | *Evaluation 123* | *Evaluation 234* |
> |--+--+--|
> | Option 1 | 27 | 26 |
> | Option 2 | 22 | 24 |
> | Option 3 |
* Michael Brand wrote:
> Hi Karl
Hi!
> If you are not looking for range formulas
>
>| | a | b |
>|--+---+---|
>| 2014 | x | x |
>| 2015 | x | x |
> #+TBLFM: @<<$<<..@>$> = x
>
> an example would help me to understand.
Sure:
| *Option* | *Evaluation 123* | *Evaluation 234* |
|-
Hi Karl
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Karl Voit wrote:
> I often end up creating a table where I do the header and the outer
> leftmost column. Then I start by creating the second column with
> formulas. In many cases, the following columns are like the previous
> one but with, e.g., $3 inste
Hi!
I often end up creating a table where I do the header and the outer
leftmost column. Then I start by creating the second column with
formulas. In many cases, the following columns are like the previous
one but with, e.g., $3 instead of $2 in all formulas.
Either there is another solution to m
