Re: [O] org-table-copy-down incrementor

Hi Bastien, I'm late to this party I know, but wanted to confirm all is working well for me too. Best regards, Stacey On 20 May 2014, at 15:11, Bastien wrote: > Hi Michael, > > Michael Brand writes: > >> For me it would be already enough and preferred when the increment >> would be the sa

Re: [O] org-table-copy-down incrementor

Hi Bastien On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 6:38 PM, Bastien wrote: > Er, fixed, thanks! I tried some (3 * 2 * 2) variants and all work, thank you. Michael

Re: [O] org-table-copy-down incrementor

Michael Brand writes: > I get a "setq: Wrong type argument: stringp" with SHIFT-RET in the empty > field of > | 2 | > | | > and > | [2014-04-30 Wed] | > | | > and > | 1.1 | > | | Er, fixed, thanks! -- Bastien

Re: [O] org-table-copy-down incrementor

Hi Bastien On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Bastien wrote: > Michael Brand writes: >> I did not notice before but the first commit >> 7ac468ff5547891503b6b8f5fa03793d79b3bff6 >> changed SHIFT-RET on the empty field >> | 2 | >> | 5 | >> | | >> to add a new row instead of only replac

Re: [O] org-table-copy-down incrementor

Hi Michael, Michael Brand writes: > I did not notice before but the first commit > 7ac468ff5547891503b6b8f5fa03793d79b3bff6 > changed SHIFT-RET on the empty field > | 2 | > | 5 | > | | > to add a new row instead of only replacing the current field. This is now fixed in master, tha

Re: [O] org-table-copy-down incrementor

Hi Bastien On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 9:45 PM, Bastien wrote: > Yes. There is also `thing-at-point' which does not recognize 1.1 as a > number... I circumvented this by using `calc-eval'. The above should > now work correctly. Yes it does. Using Calc is a nice solution, thank you. I did not noti

Re: [O] org-table-copy-down incrementor

Hi Michael, Michael Brand writes: > As I see only now the use case > | 1.1 | > | -0.5 | > does not seem easy to increment by -1.6 due to the formatting of the > result, so I don't expect it to be implemented. (number-to-string is > not enough because of the inaccuracy of the fraction.)

Re: [O] org-table-copy-down incrementor

Hi Bastien On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Bastien wrote: > Michael Brand writes: >> For me it would be already enough and preferred when the increment >> would be the same as in the two fields above point. > > I pushed a change in master for this -- Thank you for implementing this. > can you

Re: [O] org-table-copy-down incrementor

Hi Michael, Michael Brand writes: > For me it would be already enough and preferred when the increment > would be the same as in the two fields above point. I pushed a change in master for this -- can you please check it works as expected for you? Thanks for this suggestion! (A lot easier tha

Re: [O] org-table-copy-down incrementor

Hi Bastien On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 6:06 PM, Bastien wrote: > The idea came up earlier on to let org-table-copy-down increment by > using a table formula -- which is my TODO list for Org 8.3. I'll let > the list know when it's ready, but I think it would be a useful > feature. For me it would be

Re: [O] org-table-copy-down incrementor

Hi Stacey, Stacey Marshall writes: > I am not a member of this list... I discovered it via > , a link to the list there would > be helpful. I added a link to the manual, thanks. > I discovered org-table-copy-down and its ability to increment dates. > I wo

[O] org-table-copy-down incrementor

Hi, I've been using org-mode for a little over a year, wish I had been using it for far longer. I am not a member of this list... I discovered it via , a link to the list there would be helpful. I discovered org-table-copy-down and its ability to incremen