At Sat, 13 Aug 2011 09:03:40 -0500,
Matt Lundin wrote:
>
> David Maus writes:
>
> > At Sat, 13 Aug 2011 09:25:19 +0200,
> > David Maus wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Matt,
> >> Hi Sebastien,
> >>
> >> I pushed a temporary workaround to master that should fix the problem
> >> with refile and capture. Both dep
David Maus writes:
> At Sat, 13 Aug 2011 09:25:19 +0200,
> David Maus wrote:
>>
>> Hi Matt,
>> Hi Sebastien,
>>
>> I pushed a temporary workaround to master that should fix the problem
>> with refile and capture. Both depend on a buggy behavior of
>> org-paste-subtree, i.e. pasting a subtree *abo
At Sat, 13 Aug 2011 09:25:19 +0200,
David Maus wrote:
>
> Hi Matt,
> Hi Sebastien,
>
> I pushed a temporary workaround to master that should fix the problem
> with refile and capture. Both depend on a buggy behavior of
> org-paste-subtree, i.e. pasting a subtree *above* the target headline
> when c
Hi Matt,
Hi Sebastien,
I pushed a temporary workaround to master that should fix the problem
with refile and capture. Both depend on a buggy behavior of
org-paste-subtree, i.e. pasting a subtree *above* the target headline
when called with point at the beginning of the target headline.
A fix for
Matt Lundin writes:
>
> If I kill subtree "Four" and call org-paste-subtree with the point on
> "Two" (or if I refile it to "Two"), I get the following:
>
> * One
>
> Text in one
>
> * Two
> * Four
>
> Text in four
>
> Text in two
>
> * Three
>
> Text in three
I should add that the correct result
The following commit broke org-paste-subtree (and, as a result, refile):
,
| commit ece3091f16af246780e29ba6e8248dd8bb3b7ba2
| Author: David Maus
| Date: Wed Aug 10 18:38:26 2011 +0200
|
| Don't eat headline when yank with point at existing headline
|
| * org.el (org-paste-sub
