Re: [O] org-mobile-push vs. symlinks

2013-01-07 Thread Bastien
Hi James, James Harkins writes: > I just looked at the footnote text... why did we go from "symlinks > work if the name is the same" to an unqualified "symlinks are not > supported"? Should be fixed now... thanks, -- Bastien

Re: [O] org-mobile-push vs. symlinks

2013-01-06 Thread Bastien
James Harkins writes: > I just looked at the footnote text... why did we go from "symlinks > work if the name is the same" to an unqualified "symlinks are not > supported"? I overlooked the difference. Please provide a patch. ~$ git clone git://orgmode.org/org-mode.git ~$ emacs & C-x f org-mo

Re: [O] org-mobile-push vs. symlinks

2013-01-06 Thread James Harkins
On Jan 6, 2013 9:57 PM, "Bastien" wrote: > > Hi James, > > James Harkins writes: > > > I'm not sure of the procedure to contribute to the org manual, but I > > might suggest something like this, under MobileOrg section B2: > > I added a footnote: > http://orgmode.org/cgit.cgi/org-mode.git/commit/

Re: [O] org-mobile-push vs. symlinks

2013-01-06 Thread Bastien
Hi James, James Harkins writes: > I'm not sure of the procedure to contribute to the org manual, but I > might suggest something like this, under MobileOrg section B2: I added a footnote: http://orgmode.org/cgit.cgi/org-mode.git/commit/?id=76684b5 Thanks! -- Bastien

Re: [O] org-mobile-push vs. symlinks

2013-01-06 Thread James Harkins
On Jan 4, 2013 11:34 PM, "Bastien" wrote: > > Hi James, > > James Harkins writes: > > > The outcome is the same as the first: document the issue. > > Org is yours :) I worked in software support for awhile, so... I know what it means, e.g., when some behavior is labeled a "known issue" ;-) I'm

Re: [O] org-mobile-push vs. symlinks

2013-01-04 Thread Bastien
Hi James, James Harkins writes: > The outcome is the same as the first: document the issue. Org is yours :) -- Bastien

Re: [O] org-mobile-push vs. symlinks

2013-01-04 Thread James Harkins
On Jan 3, 2013 8:57 PM, "Bastien" wrote: > > Hi James, > > James Harkins writes: > > > - One should not put symlinks into org-directory, or at least make > > sure the symlink's name is the same as the target. If this is an > > intentional limitation, it should be documented. > > > > - Or, the sym

Re: [O] org-mobile-push vs. symlinks

2013-01-03 Thread Bastien
Hi James, James Harkins writes: > - One should not put symlinks into org-directory, or at least make > sure the symlink's name is the same as the target. If this is an > intentional limitation, it should be documented. > > - Or, the symlink resolution is not actually necessary and it causes > pr

Re: [O] org-mobile-push vs. symlinks

2012-12-19 Thread Bastien
Hi David, da...@adboyd.com (J. David Boyd) writes: > How would we do that? Are there instructions somewhere on the proper > way to create a patch file for this? The proper mode for diff? What > has to be in a changelog? > > There are a few changes I'd like to see in mobile.el myself, and I'm

Re: [O] org-mobile-push vs. symlinks

2012-12-19 Thread J. David Boyd
Bastien writes: > James Harkins writes: > >> Anyway, I still don't understand the rationale for the current >> behavior. Does anyone know why org-mobile-push resolves the agenda >> files' names to symlink targets? > > The problem is that there is no active maintainer on org-mobile.el > right no

Re: [O] org-mobile-push vs. symlinks

2012-12-15 Thread Bastien
James Harkins writes: > Anyway, I still don't understand the rationale for the current > behavior. Does anyone know why org-mobile-push resolves the agenda > files' names to symlink targets? The problem is that there is no active maintainer on org-mobile.el right now... by default this is me,

[O] org-mobile-push vs. symlinks

2012-12-15 Thread James Harkins
Sorry for resending as a new thread. I had wanted to reply to my original message on gmane, but gmane's search fails to locate the thread (?). Anyway, I still don't understand the rationale for the current behavior. Does anyone know why org-mobile-push resolves the agenda files' names to symlink t