Re: [O] org-image-actual-width has no effect

2014-08-31 Thread Claudius Mueller
I got it to work! Thanks to Nick's code pointing to org-mode as the culprit, I re-installed org on top of a fresh compile of emacs (24.3.1). Using the org version that came with the freshly compiled emacs, inline images did not scale. Installing the latest version of org (8.2.7c) and org-plus-c

Re: [O] org-image-actual-width has no effect

2014-08-30 Thread Claudius Mueller
Nick, your code worked! My example image was small and I could change the size by altering the width variable. The same image in a regular org file is huge. That means something is wrong with my org-mode install? I have not changed or done anything to org-mode that came with the compiled emacs

Re: [O] org-image-actual-width has no effect

2014-08-29 Thread Nick Dokos
Claudius Mueller writes: > Thanks for trying to help! I really appreciate that! > > (image-type-available-p 'imagemagick) ==> output: "t" > org-image-actual-width ==> output: "10" > > I had set org-image-actual-width to 10 in the .emacs file to make sure > I really notice the difference once the

Re: [O] org-image-actual-width has no effect

2014-08-29 Thread Claudius Mueller
Thanks for trying to help! I really appreciate that! (image-type-available-p 'imagemagick) ==> output: "t" org-image-actual-width ==> output: "10" I had set org-image-actual-width to 10 in the .emacs file to make sure I really notice the difference once the problem is solved. Claudius On 08

Re: [O] org-image-actual-width has no effect

2014-08-29 Thread Nick Dokos
Claudius Mueller writes: > I tried your file - but whatever I do the images are shown the same > size. I also had to manually paste in ditaa.jar because my compiled > emacs version (24.3) that includes org does not include the > contributed org scripts. > ditaa was just a quick way for me to get

Re: [O] org-image-actual-width has no effect

2014-08-29 Thread Claudius Mueller
I tried your file - but whatever I do the images are shown the same size. I also had to manually paste in ditaa.jar because my compiled emacs version (24.3) that includes org does not include the contributed org scripts. I guess I'm at my wits end. Thank you, Claudius On 08/29/2014 10:43 AM

Re: [O] org-image-actual-width has no effect

2014-08-29 Thread Nick Dokos
Claudius Mueller writes: > Thank you for pointing this out. I compiled emacs 24.3 with > imagemagick support: > > "ldd /usr/local/bin/emacs | grep Magick" > > libMagickWand-6.Q16.so.1 => /usr/lib64/libMagickWand-6.Q16.so.1 > (0x7f3946278000) > libMagickCore-6.Q16.so.1 => /usr/lib64/libMag

Re: [O] org-image-actual-width has no effect

2014-08-29 Thread Claudius Mueller
Thank you for pointing this out. I compiled emacs 24.3 with imagemagick support: "ldd /usr/local/bin/emacs | grep Magick" > libMagickWand-6.Q16.so.1 => /usr/lib64/libMagickWand-6.Q16.so.1 (0x7f3946278000) libMagickCore-6.Q16.so.1 => /usr/lib64/libMagickCore-6.Q16.so.1 (0x7f3945dd90

Re: [O] org-image-actual-width has no effect

2014-08-28 Thread Charles Philip Chan
On 28 Aug 2014, claudius.muel...@gmail.com wrote: > I am using emacs 24.3 in openSUSE 13.1. I have not compiled emacs > myself, but the core imagemagick libraries are part of the > dependencies, which makes me assume that it's been compiled with > imagemagick support. No, the Emacs in OpenSuSE 13

[O] org-image-actual-width has no effect

2014-08-28 Thread Claudius Mueller
Hello, I have trouble getting org-mode to scale inline images. Using (setq org-image-actual-width 100) in my .emacs file has no effect on image size. I am using emacs 24.3 in openSUSE 13.1. I have not compiled emacs myself, but the core imagemagick libraries are part of the dependencies, whi