Re: [O] org-debbugs.el

Hi Michael, Michael Albinus writes: > Did you read the whole thread? My last message on the topic? > > Nope, I missed this, sorry. Thanks for resending it! -- Bastien

Re: [O] org-debbugs.el

Bastien writes: > Hi Michael, Hi Bastien, > Can you resend a patch so that I add this to contrib/? Did you read the whole thread? My last message on the topic? > Thanks! Best regards, Michael.

Re: [O] org-debbugs.el

Hi Michael, Michael Albinus writes: > I have produced a very first shot of org-debbugs.el. Can you resend a patch so that I add this to contrib/? Thanks! -- Bastien

Re: [O] org-debbugs.el

Michael Albinus writes: Hi, >> If the org-mode maintainers find this package useful, it could be added >> to the contrib directory. > > Still no response from the maintainers. Before I continue to invest into > this package, I would like to know whether it is a suitable > approach. Otherwise,

Re: [O] org-debbugs.el

Nicolas Richard writes: > Hello Michael, Hi Nicolas, > While trying your package, I noticed that C-h m would not work because > of a misplaced docstring. Here's the patch (but I'm not sure I have the > latest version, sorry if this is already fixed). Thanks. I've submitted a similar patch so

Re: [O] org-debbugs.el

On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 01:55:56PM +0200, Nicolas Richard wrote: > > Also, I heard recently on #org-mode about bugpile, which is an old (last > updated more than a year ago) of Thorsten Jolitz and Eric Schulte. The > doc says: > , > | The Bugpile project has two goals: > | > | Develop a

Re: [O] org-debbugs.el

Nicolas Richard writes: > Also, I heard recently on #org-mode about bugpile, which is an old (last > updated more than a year ago) of Thorsten Jolitz and Eric Schulte. The > doc says: This wasn't implemented, unfortunately, but stay tuned ... its somehow still in the pipeline. -- cheers, Thors

Re: [O] org-debbugs.el

Michael Albinus writes: > Michael Albinus writes: > > Hi, > >> If the org-mode maintainers find this package useful, it could be added >> to the contrib directory. > > Still no response from the maintainers. Before I continue to invest into > this package, I would like to know whether it is a

Re: [O] org-debbugs.el

Hi Michael, On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 10:03:34AM +0200, Michael Albinus wrote: > > > Michael Albinus writes: > > Hi, > > > If the org-mode maintainers find this package useful, it could be added > > to the contrib directory. > > Still no response from the maintainers. Before I continue to inve

Re: [O] org-debbugs.el

Michael Albinus writes: Hi, > If the org-mode maintainers find this package useful, it could be added > to the contrib directory. Still no response from the maintainers. Before I continue to invest into this package, I would like to know whether it is a suitable approach. Otherwise, I could s

Re: [O] org-debbugs.el

Hi Michael, On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 09:19:27PM +0200, Michael Albinus wrote: > Michael Albinus writes: > > Hi Suvayu, > > >> I tried to test by looking for a specific bug. This is what I tried: > >> > >> - search phrase: emacsclient > >> - submitter: fatkasuvayu (that is leading part of my ema

Re: [O] org-debbugs.el

Michael Albinus writes: Hi Suvayu, >> I tried to test by looking for a specific bug. This is what I tried: >> >> - search phrase: emacsclient >> - submitter: fatkasuvayu (that is leading part of my email address) >> - status: done or nothing >> >> But then I get an empty "*Org Bugs*" buffer. >

Re: [O] org-debbugs.el

On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 01:47:33PM +0200, Michael Albinus wrote: > Michael Albinus writes: > > >> I tried to test by looking for a specific bug. This is what I tried: > >> > >> - search phrase: emacsclient > >> - submitter: fatkasuvayu (that is leading part of my email address) > >> - status: do

Re: [O] org-debbugs.el

On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 01:44:36PM +0200, Michael Albinus wrote: > Suvayu Ali writes: > > > A small problem though, calling org-debbugs-search or org-debbugs-bugs > > from an "*Org Bugs*" buffer gives me the following backtraces: > > Oops. Fixed, patch appended. Problem fixed, confirmed :). --

Re: [O] org-debbugs.el

Michael Albinus writes: >> I tried to test by looking for a specific bug. This is what I tried: >> >> - search phrase: emacsclient >> - submitter: fatkasuvayu (that is leading part of my email address) >> - status: done or nothing >> >> But then I get an empty "*Org Bugs*" buffer. > > Hmm, yes.

Re: [O] org-debbugs.el

Suvayu Ali writes: > Hi Michael, Hi Suvayu, > I tried to test by looking for a specific bug. This is what I tried: > > - search phrase: emacsclient > - submitter: fatkasuvayu (that is leading part of my email address) > - status: done or nothing > > But then I get an empty "*Org Bugs*" buffer.

Re: [O] org-debbugs.el

Hi Michael, On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 09:46:08AM +0200, Michael Albinus wrote: > Michael Albinus writes: > > Hi, > > > I have produced a very first shot of org-debbugs.el. It shows you bug > > reports from debbugs.gnu.org as TODO items. It needs the debbugs package > > from the GNU ELPA repositor

Re: [O] org-debbugs.el

Michael Albinus writes: Hi, > I have produced a very first shot of org-debbugs.el. It shows you bug > reports from debbugs.gnu.org as TODO items. It needs the debbugs package > from the GNU ELPA repository. Well, there hasn't been too much response for this. I have completed the work anyway. Ma

Re: [O] org-debbugs.el

On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 09:28:00PM +0200, Michael Albinus wrote: > Hi, > > I have produced a very first shot of org-debbugs.el. It shows you bug > reports from debbugs.gnu.org as TODO items. It needs the debbugs package > from the GNU ELPA repository. > > If you want to try it, you could call >

[O] org-debbugs.el

Hi, I have produced a very first shot of org-debbugs.el. It shows you bug reports from debbugs.gnu.org as TODO items. It needs the debbugs package from the GNU ELPA repository. If you want to try it, you could call (org-debbugs nil '("org-mode")) You will see a list of TODO items which belong