Applied, thanks!
Dov Grobgeld writes:
> Sure. They should be equivalent. (In C++ return is prefered as it calls
> destructors. But anyone relying on this when using C++ in org-mode should
> imnsho get a permanent ban from ever using C/C++ ;-).
>
> Regards,
> Dov
>
> On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 17:56,
Sure. They should be equivalent. (In C++ return is prefered as it calls
destructors. But anyone relying on this when using C++ in org-mode should
imnsho get a permanent ban from ever using C/C++ ;-).
Regards,
Dov
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 17:56, Eric Schulte wrote:
> Dov Grobgeld writes:
>
> > Oo
Dov Grobgeld writes:
> Oops. I sawthat I wrote "do not get any error" though I meant "do not get
> any resulting output".
>
Would this alternate version work (without requiring stdlib.h)?
(defun org-babel-C-ensure-main-wrap (body)
"Wrap body in a \"main\" function call if none exists."
(if
Oops. I sawthat I wrote "do not get any error" though I meant "do not get
any resulting output".
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 11:13, Dov Grobgeld wrote:
> When running a babel C session under Linux/gcc I do not get any error
> unless I add exit(0) as part of the C-code snippet. For some to me not
> u
When running a babel C session under Linux/gcc I do not get any error
unless I add exit(0) as part of the C-code snippet. For some to me not
understood reason my program exits with error code=4, which is caught by
org-babel-eval and the printed output is not inserted into my buffer . I
solved this