Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Hello,
>
> John J Foerch writes:
>
>> Okay, will do.Here is an updated version of the patch. I started the
>> process for copyright assignment as well.
>
> Great.
>
> I added an entry in ORG-NEWS and applied your patch. Thank you.
>
> Regards,
Many thanks
--
John Foe
Hello,
John J Foerch writes:
> Okay, will do.Here is an updated version of the patch. I started the
> process for copyright assignment as well.
Great.
I added an entry in ORG-NEWS and applied your patch. Thank you.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Hello,
>
> John J Foerch writes:
>
>> I would be glad to do the paperwork, but as it's such a simple change, I
>> have no objections to anybody else implementing this feature request in
>> my place if they want to. I think it would save time.
>
> There is no rush. Besi
Hello,
John J Foerch writes:
> I would be glad to do the paperwork, but as it's such a simple change, I
> have no objections to anybody else implementing this feature request in
> my place if they want to. I think it would save time.
There is no rush. Besides, your patch can still fit within t
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Hello,
>
> John J Foerch writes:
>
>> I would like for org-attach's automatic committing of attachments to be
>> easily disabled. Something along the lines of the attached patch.
>> Thoughts?
>
> Thank you. A few stylistic comments follow.
>
>> Subject: [PATCH] org-att
Hi!
John J Foerch writes:
> I would like for org-attach's automatic committing of attachments to be
> easily disabled. Something along the lines of the attached patch.
> Thoughts?
I think this is a good idea since it extends the user's possibility.
Further it looks natural to me to do *one* c
Hello,
John J Foerch writes:
> I would like for org-attach's automatic committing of attachments to be
> easily disabled. Something along the lines of the attached patch.
> Thoughts?
Thank you. A few stylistic comments follow.
> Subject: [PATCH] org-attach-attach: make use of git optional wit
Hello,
I would like for org-attach's automatic committing of attachments to be
easily disabled. Something along the lines of the attached patch.
Thoughts?
Thank you,
John Foerch
>From 2e6b4adb249ea36cd3546068974e97ff50e1e76b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: John Foerch
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 17: