Re: [O] modeline vs modeline

2012-10-24 Thread Bastien
Hi Brendan, Brendan Halpin writes: > but that still leaves the problem of dealing with the Emacs/Xemacs > compatibility. Is there a way of aliasing face attributes? Aliasing the face name should be enough. But the 'modeline face has been removed from Emacs at the beginning of this month, so I

Re: [O] modeline vs modeline

2012-10-24 Thread Bastien
Hi Brendan, Brendan Halpin writes: > I've just updated to emacs-snapshot 24.2.50.1 (of 2012-10-18) on Debian, > and have run in to a faces problem. In short references to modeline > should be to mode-line. Making 4 changes in org-faces.el is enough. Fixed, thanks. -- Bastien

Re: [O] modeline vs modeline

2012-10-24 Thread Brendan Halpin
On Wed, Oct 24 2012, Sebastien Vauban wrote: > Maybe you could provide a patch? > > Though, a quick note: AFAICT, in GNU Emacs, the modeline is written > "mode-line"; but written "modeline" under XEmacs. I don't know how that fact > is supported in Org (as it is still supposed to run under XEmacs

Re: [O] modeline vs modeline

2012-10-24 Thread Sebastien Vauban
Hi Brendan, Brendan Halpin wrote: > I've just updated to emacs-snapshot 24.2.50.1 (of 2012-10-18) on Debian, > and have run in to a faces problem. In short references to modeline > should be to mode-line. Making 4 changes in org-faces.el is enough. Maybe you could provide a patch? Though, a quic

[O] modeline vs modeline

2012-10-23 Thread Brendan Halpin
I've just updated to emacs-snapshot 24.2.50.1 (of 2012-10-18) on Debian, and have run in to a faces problem. In short references to modeline should be to mode-line. Making 4 changes in org-faces.el is enough. Brendan -- Brendan Halpin, Department of Sociology, University of Limerick, Irelan