Michael Sperber writes:
> Yes. I've also had to apply a few fixes to make the current XEmacs
> work. I intend to send a new batch of patches in two weeks or so, once
> everything has settled down on my end. (Until then, I'm quite swamped.
> If I don't answer e-mail in that timeframe, please don'
Bastien writes:
> Achim Gratz writes:
>
>> Bastien writes:
>>> There is a fix that makes the new Makefile compatible with everyone's
>>> configuration *without* requiring to add the version number directly in
>>> the org.el file. I'm discussing it with Achim and will commit it as
>>> soon as p
Hi Sébastien,
"Sebastien Vauban"
writes:
> You think that everything related to the Test package would have been loaded
> correctly. Not the case, "obviously"...
More precisely: it has been _loaded_ correctly (i.e. it is in the load
path), but the functions have been _autoloaded_ from a previ
Hi Sébastien,
"Sebastien Vauban"
writes:
> You think that everything related to the Test package would have been loaded
> correctly. Not the case, "obviously"...
More precisely: it has been _loaded_ correctly (i.e. it is in the load
path), but the functions have been _autoloaded_ from a previou
Achim Gratz writes:
> Bastien writes:
>> There is a fix that makes the new Makefile compatible with everyone's
>> configuration *without* requiring to add the version number directly in
>> the org.el file. I'm discussing it with Achim and will commit it as
>> soon as possible.
>
> Towards that e
Hi Achim,
Achim Gratz wrote:
> Sebastien Vauban writes:
>> Here, I would have thought that invoking the function `text-aux' would open
>> the "production" Lisp file (that is, the one in Emacs code base) as you use
>> Emacs loaddefs.el associations, no?
>
> It could be set up that way, but isn't.
Bastien writes:
> There is a fix that makes the new Makefile compatible with everyone's
> configuration *without* requiring to add the version number directly in
> the org.el file. I'm discussing it with Achim and will commit it as
> soon as possible.
Towards that end, I can test Emacs23 and Emac
Hi all,
thanks Achim for this lengthy post, it's definitely worth reading for
anyone who got confused by autoloading stuff once in his life (I did,
who didn't?)
Now, I should have warned the mailing list about possible breakage in
people's configuration, I apologize for this.
There is a fix that
Martyn Jago writes:
> As an aside, I haven't used MS windows for some two years (using OS X
> and Linux), but this will change shortly as my next project will require
> a working Windows system with MSys. I could certainly document the setup
> of Org-mode including functioning tests etc. on a line-
Sebastien Vauban writes:
> Here, I would have thought that invoking the function `text-aux' would open
> the "production" Lisp file (that is, the one in Emacs code base) as you use
> Emacs loaddefs.el associations, no?
It could be set up that way, but isn't. You wouldn't be able to move an
instal
Hi Achim
Achim Gratz writes:
> Since my Makefile branch was merged I've been getting flak for breaking
> certain setups. Now, the change didn't actually break them, but I did
> make (perhaps foolishly) a deliberate decision to make that particular
> breakage fatal rather than silent. It would
> Since my Makefile branch was merged I've been getting flak for breaking
> certain setups. Now, the change didn't actually break them, but I did
> make (perhaps foolishly) a deliberate decision to make that particular
> breakage fatal rather than silent. It would be very easy to continue to
>
Hi Achim,
Achim Gratz wrote:
> Since my Makefile branch was merged I've been getting flak for breaking
> certain setups. Now, the change didn't actually break them, but I did
> make (perhaps foolishly) a deliberate decision to make that particular
> breakage fatal rather than silent. It would be
Since my Makefile branch was merged I've been getting flak for breaking
certain setups. Now, the change didn't actually break them, but I did
make (perhaps foolishly) a deliberate decision to make that particular
breakage fatal rather than silent. It would be very easy to continue to
paper over t
14 matches
Mail list logo
