Eric Abrahamsen writes:
> The patch series that would not die!
:)
Applied, thanks!
--
Bastien
Bastien writes:
> Hi Eric,
>
> Eric Abrahamsen writes:
>
>> Sorry this took a while to get to...
>>
>> I think it was a little simpler than I thought -- at least I hope that's
>> true, and I'm not missing something really obvious. There are two
>> patches attached, a simple one that handles re-j
Hi Eric,
Eric Abrahamsen writes:
> Sorry this took a while to get to...
>
> I think it was a little simpler than I thought -- at least I hope that's
> true, and I'm not missing something really obvious. There are two
> patches attached, a simple one that handles re-justification of table
> field
Ah yes, this won't work if your font draws characters at variable
widths. I use Chinese a lot, and some Chinese fonts will still create
misalignment, simply because a Chinese character as drawn as 192% the
width of an ascii character. Dunno how to get around that.
On 02/11/14 10:50 AM, Steffan Ive
Thanks Eric - I've used this patch but I doesn't seem to solve the problem.
I'm working on an earlier suggestion by Michael about the unicode type that
my Tibetan font is. I very much appreciate all this help!
Steffan
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 8:09 PM, Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
> Bastien writes:
>
>
Bastien writes:
> Eric Abrahamsen writes:
>
>> I've been using that patch or something like it for nearly a year now,
>> with no adverse effects. I'm on the road right now, give me a day and
>> I'll take a closer look at what I've got...
>
> Great -- thanks in advance! I'll then wait before rel
Hi Steffan
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 6:35 AM, Michael Brand
wrote:
> Is there any font that is monospaced even in the Tibetan range at all?
On one of my "trips" of learning more about unicode I just discovered
the monospaced bitmap font GNU Unifont [1] [2] which implements most
of (!) the range U+0
Hi Steffan
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:00 AM, Steffan Iverson
wrote:
> Michael, that test case you suggest does indeed cause the same spacing
> problem. So this isn't a problem from the vowel stacking in Tibetan,
Such combining characters and and also double width characters may
still remain as sep
Michael, that test case you suggest does indeed cause the same spacing
problem. So this isn't a problem from the vowel stacking in Tibetan,
because of the type of font it is? Sorry, generally new to Emacs so I'm not
sure how to move forward with that insight.
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Mich
Hi Steffan
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 6:33 AM, Steffan Iverson
wrote:
> Screenshot: http://oi59.tinypic.com/lz893.jpg
Judging from e. g. this part
| རྐུས་ | rkus |
| གསོས་ | gsos |
in your screenshot my speculation is that you get glyphs from not only your
default monospace font but also from other
Eric Abrahamsen writes:
> I've been using that patch or something like it for nearly a year now,
> with no adverse effects. I'm on the road right now, give me a day and
> I'll take a closer look at what I've got...
Great -- thanks in advance! I'll then wait before releasing a new
minor version
Bastien writes:
> Hi Steffan,
>
> thanks for reporting this.
>
> Steffan Iverson writes:
>
>> Any way to solve this problem?
>
> This is a recurring problem, and Eric is the one who tried
> to solve it.
>
> Eric, I don't remember why we didn't follow-up on your patch
> here:
>
> http://lists.gnu
Hi Steffan,
thanks for reporting this.
Steffan Iverson writes:
> Any way to solve this problem?
This is a recurring problem, and Eric is the one who tried
to solve it.
Eric, I don't remember why we didn't follow-up on your patch
here:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2013-02/m
Screenshot: http://oi59.tinypic.com/lz893.jpg
On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 7:29 PM, Steffan Iverson
wrote:
> Hello all,
>
>
> I've made an org table that includes both English and Tibetan characters,
> and the columns don't line up. I suspect this is because of the way
> Tibetan
> characters are displ
Hello all,
I've made an org table that includes both English and Tibetan characters,
and the columns don't line up. I suspect this is because of the way Tibetan
characters are displayed - they "stack" below and above each other, making
the characters vertically taller than the English characters.
15 matches
Mail list logo