"Feng Shu" writes:
> Nicolas Goaziou writes:
>
>> tumashu writes:
>>
>>> The problem is that the pic is too small and nearly can not see the
>>> words in the picture, it will force user config it, if we use a larger
>>> pic, it can work although it is ugly
>>
>> Then is :scale 1.2 enough?
>
> I
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> tumashu writes:
>
>> The problem is that the pic is too small and nearly can not see the
>> words in the picture, it will force user config it, if we use a larger
>> pic, it can work although it is ugly
>
> Then is :scale 1.2 enough?
I tested in bare emacs, 1.2 seem ok
tumashu writes:
> The problem is that the pic is too small and nearly can not see the
> words in the picture, it will force user config it, if we use a larger
> pic, it can work although it is ugly
Then is :scale 1.2 enough?
If it is too ugly, it will also force users configuring it anyway.
Re
The problem is that the pic is too small and nearly can not see the words in
the picture, it will force user config it, if we use a larger pic, it can work
although it is ugly
在 2016-05-14 16:56:15，"Nicolas Goaziou" 写道：
Hello,
tumashu writes:
> The preview png of latex fragment seem to small,
Hello,
tumashu writes:
> The preview png of latex fragment seem to small, what about change
> default `org-format-latex-options' :scale from 1.0 to 2.0?
As a data point, I use :scale 1.2. A factor of 2 may be too large for
some users.
In any case, the manual already highlights it:
You c
The preview png of latex fragment seem to small, what about change default
`org-format-latex-options' :scale from 1.0 to 2.0?
