On 3/6/14 9:22 PM, Eric Schulte wrote:
How about the following alternative to my previous suggestion, which will
eliminate the extra lines.
Looks beautiful initially, but leads to some confusing behaviors due to
invisible lines. But eliminating extra lines is only important for some
section
> I'm finding that Org would work well as a literate programming system
> for C++, if the code block starts and ends didn't get in the way so much
> during frequent switching between code and prose.
>
> > I use the following to make code block syntax less intrusive
>
> Thanks, that was helpful,
On 3/6/14 5:04 PM, Eric Schulte wrote:
I think code blocks work well for non-inline code.
For a series of one-liners interspersed with comments, code block
boundaries triple the number of lines. E.g. the example in the manual
at http://orgmode.org/org.html#noweb_002dref
+BEGIN_SRC sh :tan
> I think code blocks work well for non-inline code.
For a series of one-liners interspersed with comments, code block
boundaries triple the number of lines. E.g. the example in the manual
at http://orgmode.org/org.html#noweb_002dref
+BEGIN_SRC sh :tangle yes :noweb yes :shebang #!/bin/sh
Ilya Shlyakhter writes:
> Some questions about inline source code blocks:
>
>- They're not fontified even when org-src-fontify-natively is true
> -- correct?
Correct.
>
>- They're not included in tangled code; is that intended behavior?
> The manual does not seem to say they're differe
Some questions about inline source code blocks:
- They're not fontified even when org-src-fontify-natively is true
-- correct?
- They're not included in tangled code; is that intended behavior?
The manual does not seem to say they're different from normal code
blocks, except for syntax.
T
