Eric Schulte writes:
> Done.
Thanks for this.
I agree with Nicolas that small changes like this won't encourage
a structural change by themselves, but they do not harm either,
so let's not refrain from making them.
--
Bastien
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Eric Schulte writes:
>
>> Should this be done personally or in master?
>
> I can't think of a case where it could lead to confusion, so I'd say it
> can go in master, at least until someone complains, if ever.
>
Done. Thanks -- Eric
--
Eric Schulte
https://cs.unm.edu
Eric Schulte writes:
> Should this be done personally or in master?
I can't think of a case where it could lead to confusion, so I'd say it
can go in master, at least until someone complains, if ever.
BTW, as a reminder, I'm all for thinking again how emphasis/verbatim
markup is defined in Org
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Hello,
>
> Eric Schulte writes:
>
>> I'm writing a document in which I use footnotes to hold references to
>> many tools. One often wants the tool name in tt font, and the footnote
>> to be touching the tool name (i.e. =tool=[fn:1] ). Unfortunately
>> currently Org-mo
Hello,
Eric Schulte writes:
> I'm writing a document in which I use footnotes to hold references to
> many tools. One often wants the tool name in tt font, and the footnote
> to be touching the tool name (i.e. =tool=[fn:1] ). Unfortunately
> currently Org-mode doesn't fontify or export "tool"
Hi,
I'm writing a document in which I use footnotes to hold references to
many tools. One often wants the tool name in tt font, and the footnote
to be touching the tool name (i.e. =tool=[fn:1] ). Unfortunately
currently Org-mode doesn't fontify or export "tool" in the above as tt.
Is there a wa
