On Thursday, 14 Apr 2016 at 14:36, John Hendy wrote:
[...]
> I rather like the suggestion to switch to endnotes instead if you want
> to do this often, as that's how I'm used to seeing multiple references
> cited.
If the OP was using the footnotes for references, the standard practice
is to use
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 7:44 AM, Eric S Fraga wrote:
> On Thursday, 14 Apr 2016 at 10:41, Sharon Kimble wrote:
>> When exporting an org file to latex the first instance of a footnote
>> shows as [fn:1] in the org-file, and its numbered footnote reference in
>> the latexed pdf. However, if I refer
On Thursday, 14 Apr 2016 at 10:41, Sharon Kimble wrote:
> When exporting an org file to latex the first instance of a footnote
> shows as [fn:1] in the org-file, and its numbered footnote reference in
> the latexed pdf. However, if I refer to that footnote later in the
> org-file, then its shown as
When exporting an org file to latex the first instance of a footnote
shows as [fn:1] in the org-file, and its numbered footnote reference in
the latexed pdf. However, if I refer to that footnote later in the
org-file, then its shown as [fn:1] again, but, in the latexed pdf it
just shows as a super
