On Saturday, 24 Jan 2015 at 00:08, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Hello,
>
> writes:
>
>> Thanks for the suggestion. Interestingly, the export process still
>> attempts to generate images for LaTeX fragments within sections that are
>> commented out. This seems fundamentally wrong?
>
> This should be
Hello,
writes:
> Thanks for the suggestion. Interestingly, the export process still
> attempts to generate images for LaTeX fragments within sections that are
> commented out. This seems fundamentally wrong?
This should be fixed. Thank you for reporting it.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
On Wednesday, 21 Jan 2015 at 10:42, Sebastien Vauban wrote:
[...]
> On that part, given a deadline, a workaround could be to COMMENT the
> trees you don't want to export, instead of tagging them with noexport?
Thanks for the suggestion. Interestingly, the export process still
attempts to genera
Eric S Fraga wrote:
> hopefully this request is not as embarrassing as my last one to this
> list earlier today... :-) regardless, I am definitely confused and
> things are driving me crazy. You can tell I have a deadline... :(
>
> I need to export a document to ODT, a document that has a signifi
Ignore previous message, in terms of finding a solution to my problem
please. The behaviour is still strange but using dvipng instead of
imagemagick gets me further (not all the way...).
I will stop annoying this list now. Sorry for the noise.
thanks,
eric
--
: Eric S Fraga (0xFFFCF67D), Emac
Hello,
hopefully this request is not as embarrassing as my last one to this
list earlier today... :-) regardless, I am definitely confused and
things are driving me crazy. You can tell I have a deadline... :(
I need to export a document to ODT, a document that has a significant
amount of LaTeX
