Hi Greg,
Greg Troxel writes:
> But I can deal or change my own bindings, so the question is really
> about what the ensemble of current and future users will find more
> intuitive.
Yes -- let them speak.
I don't find it intuitive to have C-c C-e in agenda trying to do
something sensible, excep
Bastien writes:
> Greg Troxel writes:
>
>> My proposal is that C-c C-e should behave similarly to when in an org
>> file, but choices that require an associated org file should be omitted.
>> Specifically, I think the following options make sense:
>> c c (ical combined)
>> c a (ical all)
>>
Hi Greg,
Greg Troxel writes:
> My proposal is that C-c C-e should behave similarly to when in an org
> file, but choices that require an associated org file should be omitted.
> Specifically, I think the following options make sense:
> c c (ical combined)
> c a (ical all)
> P x (publish -
I use org relatively normally, with notes, TODO items, and appointments
(active timestamps), and way too many of them scheduled to be done on
any given day. I export all agenda files to a combined ics file and
then stick it someplace I can subscribe to it from non-emacs calendaring
software.
To
