Hi.
>>> [...] I suggest that ODT should be provided out of the box. It is
>>> clearly in demand. It meets the needs of a whole segment of users
>>> that need to work with office software. Sure, nothing prevents them
>>> from using it by adding a brief line to their init file. But why not
>>> adve
>>> FWIW, I also think this would be a good thing to load by default.
>>
>> Done.
>
> Thanks very much, Nicolas!
+1!
Yours,
Christian
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Hello,
>
> Eric Abrahamsen writes:
>
>>> This question pops up fairly often. I suggest that ODT should be
>>> provided out of the box. It is clearly in demand. It meets the needs of
>>> a whole segment of users that need to work with office software. Sure,
>>> nothing p
Hello,
Eric Abrahamsen writes:
>> This question pops up fairly often. I suggest that ODT should be
>> provided out of the box. It is clearly in demand. It meets the needs of
>> a whole segment of users that need to work with office software. Sure,
>> nothing prevents them from using it by adding
+1 even if I personally don't use it.
For many people is the bridge to work with others.
Best...
Xebar Saram writes:
> +1 as well :)
>
> Z
>
> On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Eric Abrahamsen
> wrote:
>
> Christian Moe writes:
>
> > This question pops up fairly often. I suggest t
> Uwe Brauer writes:
> Somewhere in your init files, put (require 'ox-odt). Then it will always
> be available. Take a look at the other ox-* files, many of them are
> useful enough to always load by default.
Thanks that worked fine!
+1 as well :)
Z
On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Eric Abrahamsen
wrote:
> Christian Moe writes:
>
> > This question pops up fairly often. I suggest that ODT should be
> > provided out of the box. It is clearly in demand. It meets the needs of
> > a whole segment of users that need to work with
Christian Moe writes:
> This question pops up fairly often. I suggest that ODT should be
> provided out of the box. It is clearly in demand. It meets the needs of
> a whole segment of users that need to work with office software. Sure,
> nothing prevents them from using it by adding a brief line
This question pops up fairly often. I suggest that ODT should be
provided out of the box. It is clearly in demand. It meets the needs of
a whole segment of users that need to work with office software. Sure,
nothing prevents them from using it by adding a brief line to their init
file. But why not
Uwe Brauer writes:
> Hi
>
> When I use org-export-dispatch, then a list of possible formats pop up
> but odt is not among them. Only if I explicitly call
> org-odt-export-to-odt
>
> once, then this command pops up in the list. How
> can I change this behaviour and have the odt export function in
Hi
When I use org-export-dispatch, then a list of possible formats pop up
but odt is not among them. Only if I explicitly call
org-odt-export-to-odt
once, then this command pops up in the list. How
can I change this behaviour and have the odt export function in the
list??
Thanks
Uwe Brauer
11 matches
Mail list logo
