Re: [O] couple questions about simple todo

2015-08-12 Thread Eric Abrahamsen
scraw...@gmail.com writes: > On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 12:45:23PM +0800, Eric Abrahamsen wrote: >> scraw...@gmail.com writes: >> >> > So I can avoid looking at all that? >> >> Sure, in principle you don't need that stuff at all! It depends on what >> you're using Org for, but if you're really tryi

Re: [O] couple questions about simple todo

2015-08-12 Thread scrawler
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 12:45:23PM +0800, Eric Abrahamsen wrote: > scraw...@gmail.com writes: > > > So I can avoid looking at all that? > > Sure, in principle you don't need that stuff at all! It depends on what > you're using Org for, but if you're really trying to start simple and > build up, t

Re: [O] couple questions about simple todo

2015-08-12 Thread Peter Salazar
This is great! It should be in the tutorial or something. I'm printing it out to keep. On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 12:45 AM, Eric Abrahamsen wrote: > scraw...@gmail.com writes: > > > On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 10:27:29AM +0800, Eric Abrahamsen wrote: > >> > >> My take on what you've shown here is that

Re: [O] couple questions about simple todo

2015-08-11 Thread Eric Abrahamsen
scraw...@gmail.com writes: > On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 10:27:29AM +0800, Eric Abrahamsen wrote: >> >> My take on what you've shown here is that you've got it a bit backwards. >> Apologies if you've tried many things and you settled on this on >> purpose, but it looks like you're trying to organize

Re: [O] couple questions about simple todo

2015-08-11 Thread scrawler
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 10:27:29AM +0800, Eric Abrahamsen wrote: > > My take on what you've shown here is that you've got it a bit backwards. > Apologies if you've tried many things and you settled on this on > purpose, but it looks like you're trying to organize the Org file to > look like the Ag

Re: [O] couple questions about simple todo

2015-08-11 Thread Eric Abrahamsen
scraw...@gmail.com writes: > Hi guys, > > Pardon the baby-level questions. > > With a file that looks like this: > > #+startup: align nologdone showall > #+todo: next doing finished > > * All to Do > ** [2015-08-11 Tue] [1/1] > *** finished iron the cat > > How can I enter the date stamp so that i

Re: [O] couple questions about simple todo

2015-08-11 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, scraw...@gmail.com writes: > I'll go ahead and throw the bar in there. The last todo state is still > colored as a "done" state, even without it, but it might just be the > leuven theme that does that. No vertical bar is equivalent to a vertical bar just before the last TODO state. The v

Re: [O] couple questions about simple todo

2015-08-11 Thread scrawler
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 05:37:59PM +0100, Eric S Fraga wrote: > From the manual: > > "The vertical bar separates the TODO keywords (states that _need > action_) from the DONE states (which need _no further action_)." > I'll go ahead and throw the bar in there. The last todo state is s

Re: [O] couple questions about simple todo

2015-08-11 Thread Eric S Fraga
On Tuesday, 11 Aug 2015 at 10:46, scraw...@gmail.com wrote: [...] > How can I enter the date stamp so that it is neither active nor > inactive? I don't want a link to the agenda, and I'd like it to look > like a heading. I don't think you can. But the agenda will, by default, only show active t

[O] couple questions about simple todo

2015-08-11 Thread scrawler
Hi guys, Pardon the baby-level questions. With a file that looks like this: #+startup: align nologdone showall #+todo: next doing finished * All to Do ** [2015-08-11 Tue] [1/1] *** finished iron the cat How can I enter the date stamp so that it is neither active nor inactive? I don't want a l