Michael Brand writes:
> Hi Eric
>
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 6:09 PM, Michael Brand
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 4:53 AM, Eric Abrahamsen
>> wrote:
>
>>> 2. The text for %ITEM has the face org-whitespace applied to the leading
>>> stars, which doesn't exist anymore. I assume the intende
Hi Eric
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 6:09 PM, Michael Brand
wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 4:53 AM, Eric Abrahamsen
> wrote:
>> 2. The text for %ITEM has the face org-whitespace applied to the leading
>> stars, which doesn't exist anymore. I assume the intended effect was
>> that the stars take u
Hi Eric
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 4:53 AM, Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
> 2. The text for %ITEM has the face org-whitespace applied to the leading
> stars, which doesn't exist anymore. I assume the intended effect was
> that the stars take up space, emulating indentation, but not themselves
> be visible.
I started using column view (finally), and noticed two things I thought
were odd:
1. The %ITEM specification is zero-width by default, while the other
special properties default to being as big as they need to be. This just
seems a little odd. A column spec of %ITEM %TODO will show the TODO
proper
