Lawrence Bottorff writes:
> Yes, thanks, the :session did the trick. Is that documented somewhere?
> Also, it ignored my running MIT Scheme and fired up a Guile REPL in
> the next buffer. I guess it's doing something with Geiser, hence,
> Guile?
>
(info "(org) session"):
,
| The ‘:session’
Yes, thanks, the :session did the trick. Is that documented somewhere?
Also, it ignored my running MIT Scheme and fired up a Guile REPL in the
next buffer. I guess it's doing something with Geiser, hence, Guile?
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Nick Dokos wrote:
> Lawrence Bottorff writes:
>
>
Lawrence Bottorff writes:
> The MIT scheme repl is running in the next buffer. . .
>
Did you try it?
--8<---cut here---start->8---
#+BEGIN_SRC scheme :session foo
(define (mydouble x)
(+ x x))
#+END_SRC
#+RESULTS:
doesn't seem to remember from one block t
The MIT scheme repl is running in the next buffer. . .
On May 28, 2015 2:16 PM, "Nick Dokos" wrote:
> Lawrence Bottorff writes:
>
> > . . . installed geiser via elpa -- and got some functionality. Although
> a simple thing like
> >
> > #+BEGIN_SRC scheme
> > (define (mydouble x)
> > (+ x x))
> >
Lawrence Bottorff writes:
> . . . installed geiser via elpa -- and got some functionality. Although a
> simple thing like
>
> #+BEGIN_SRC scheme
> (define (mydouble x)
> (+ x x))
> #+END_SRC
>
> doesn't seem to remember from one block to the next. So, after defining the
> code above
>
> #+
. . . installed geiser via elpa -- and got some functionality. Although a
simple thing like
#+BEGIN_SRC scheme
(define (mydouble x)
(+ x x))
#+END_SRC
doesn't seem to remember from one block to the next. So, after defining the
code above
#+BEGIN_SRC scheme
(mydouble 5)
#+END_SRC
gives an err
#+BEGIN_SRC scheme
(define (mydouble x)
(+ x x))
#+END_SRC
produces
org-babel-execute-src-block: Symbol's value as variable is void:
geiser-default-implementation
also, no indentation or color coding of any sort (maybe this isn't a
feature yet?)
LB
