On Thu, Apr 07 2016, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Daniele Pizzolli writes:
>
>> Do I am missing something else? Thanks again for your assistance.
>
> There seems to be an issue with cache. Call `M-x
> org-element-reset-cache' before calling `org-babel-execute-buffer'.
Hello,
thanks, to be precise t
Daniele Pizzolli writes:
> Do I am missing something else? Thanks again for your assistance.
There seems to be an issue with cache. Call `M-x
org-element-reset-cache' before calling `org-babel-execute-buffer'.
Regards,
On Thu, Apr 07 2016, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Daniele Pizzolli writes:
>
>> #+NAME: pid-result
>> #+RESULTS: pid
>> #+NAME: echo-pid
>> #+BEGIN_SRC shell :var DATA=pid-result :results value
>> printf '%s' "${DATA}" #+END_SRC
>>
>> #+RESULTS: echo-pid
>
> You are giving two names to the
Hello,
Daniele Pizzolli writes:
> #+NAME: pid-result
> #+RESULTS: pid
> #+NAME: echo-pid
> #+BEGIN_SRC shell :var DATA=pid-result :results value
> printf '%s' "${DATA}" #+END_SRC
>
> #+RESULTS: echo-pid
You are giving two names to the block, which is not possible.
I don't know what you are tr
On Wed, Apr 06 2016, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Daniele Pizzolli writes:
>
>> Thanks Nicolas for the reply. Ok, but `org-babel-execute-buffer'
>> produces an inconsistent document right now.
>
> This is because you ask it to. See below.
>
>> Mmm, the same reasoning can be used for arguing about the
Daniele Pizzolli writes:
> Thanks Nicolas for the reply. Ok, but `org-babel-execute-buffer'
> produces an inconsistent document right now.
This is because you ask it to. See below.
> Mmm, the same reasoning can be used for arguing about the current
> behaviour: If I C-c C-c on a block, I expec
On Wed, Apr 06 2016, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Daniele Pizzolli writes:
>
>> is possible to update the “#+RESULTS: pid” when the block “#+NAME:
>> echo-pid” is evaluated in the following snippet?
>
> Without `org-babel-execute-buffer', I don't think so.
Hello,
Thanks Nicolas for the r
Hello,
Daniele Pizzolli writes:
> is possible to update the “#+RESULTS: pid” when the block “#+NAME:
> echo-pid” is evaluated in the following snippet?
Without `org-babel-execute-buffer', I don't think so.
> This will lead to a consistent document generation with “M-x
> org-babel-execute-buffe
Hello,
is possible to update the “#+RESULTS: pid” when the block “#+NAME:
echo-pid” is evaluated in the following snippet?
This will lead to a consistent document generation with “M-x
org-babel-execute-buffer” or by hitting “C-c C-c” on “#+NAME:
echo-pid”. Using the cache does not make sense: th
