Re: [O] Updating Worg re standard source block syntax

2011-12-15 Thread Bastien
Hi Martyn, Martyn Jago writes: > There are literally hundreds of uses of #+srcname and #+source within > Worg - should I be updating these to #+name ? In other words, does Worg > reflect the last official release (the Emacs release), or the bleeding > edge (I tend to assume the latter because of

Re: [O] Updating Worg re standard source block syntax

2011-11-30 Thread Jason Dunsmore
On Wed, Nov 23 2011, Sebastien Vauban wrote: > Hi Nick, > > Nick Dokos wrote: >> Martyn Jago wrote: >> >>> There are literally hundreds of uses of #+srcname and #+source within >>> Worg - should I be updating these to #+name ? In other words, does Worg >>> reflect the last official release (the E

Re: [O] Updating Worg re standard source block syntax

2011-11-23 Thread Sebastien Vauban
Hi Nick, Nick Dokos wrote: > Sebastien Vauban wrote: >>> Is there any way to find out what the org version is at the worg site? >> >> BTW, sorry, yes, the answer is yes: see section "What software is available >> on >> Worg for Babel code execution?" on http://orgmode.org/worg/worg-setup.html. >

Re: [O] Updating Worg re standard source block syntax

2011-11-23 Thread Nick Dokos
Sebastien Vauban wrote: > > > > Is there any way to find out what the org version is at the worg site? > > BTW, sorry, yes, the answer is yes: see section "What software is available on > Worg for Babel code execution?" on http://orgmode.org/worg/worg-setup.html. > But one can wonder if it's up-

Re: [O] Updating Worg re standard source block syntax

2011-11-23 Thread Sebastien Vauban
Hi Nick, Nick Dokos wrote: > Martyn Jago wrote: > >> There are literally hundreds of uses of #+srcname and #+source within >> Worg - should I be updating these to #+name ? In other words, does Worg >> reflect the last official release (the Emacs release), or the bleeding >> edge (I tend to assume

Re: [O] Updating Worg re standard source block syntax

2011-11-22 Thread Nick Dokos
Martyn Jago wrote: > There are literally hundreds of uses of #+srcname and #+source within > Worg - should I be updating these to #+name ? In other words, does Worg > reflect the last official release (the Emacs release), or the bleeding > edge (I tend to assume the latter because of the Org comm

Re: [O] Updating Worg re standard source block syntax

2011-11-22 Thread Nick Dokos
Martyn Jago wrote: > Hi > > There are literally hundreds of uses of #+srcname and #+source within > Worg - should I be updating these to #+name ? In other words, does Worg > reflect the last official release (the Emacs release), or the bleeding > edge (I tend to assume the latter because of the

[O] Updating Worg re standard source block syntax

2011-11-22 Thread Martyn Jago
Hi There are literally hundreds of uses of #+srcname and #+source within Worg - should I be updating these to #+name ? In other words, does Worg reflect the last official release (the Emacs release), or the bleeding edge (I tend to assume the latter because of the Org community spirit of Worg), bu