Re: [O] Table formula changes are not always necessary when moving rows

2011-03-17 Thread Nick Dokos
Carsten Dominik wrote: > > On 28.2.2011, at 12:43, Tom wrote: > > > I have a table in which I sum the values of all rows in the last > > row: vsum(@1..@-I-1). The problem is when move a row with M-up > > before the first row (e.g. I press M-up on the second row) then > > org modifies this formu

Re: [O] Table formula changes are not always necessary when moving rows

2011-03-17 Thread Carsten Dominik
On Mar 17, 2011, at 11:02 AM, Christian Moe wrote: > > >> You can also use @<<< to mean the second row > > Did you mean @<< No, I meant "third" :D > ? > > Yours, > Christian - Carsten

Re: [O] Table formula changes are not always necessary when moving rows

2011-03-17 Thread Christian Moe
You can also use @<<< to mean the second row Did you mean @<< ? Yours, Christian

Re: [O] Table formula changes are not always necessary when moving rows

2011-03-16 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 28.2.2011, at 12:43, Tom wrote: > I have a table in which I sum the values of all rows in the last > row: vsum(@1..@-I-1). The problem is when move a row with M-up > before the first row (e.g. I press M-up on the second row) then > org modifies this formula to vsum(@2..@-I-1). Hi Tom, I hav

Re: [O] Table formula changes are not always necessary when moving rows

2011-03-07 Thread Tom
Carsten Dominik gmail.com> writes: > You did not show your example, but from the > formula I would assume that you start the table immediately > with data, without a header line org a horizontal separator line. > If you did, you could do vsum(@I..II) and have a formula that is > stable against ro

Re: [O] Table formula changes are not always necessary when moving rows

2011-03-07 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 28.2.2011, at 12:43, Tom wrote: > I have a table in which I sum the values of all rows in the last > row: vsum(@1..@-I-1). The problem is when move a row with M-up > before the first row (e.g. I press M-up on the second row) then > org modifies this formula to vsum(@2..@-I-1). > > This is not

Re: [O] Table formula changes are not always necessary when moving rows

2011-03-05 Thread Bastien
Hi Tom, Tom writes: > In such cases when the formula is modified Org should either > print warning to the echo area, so the user notices when the > formulas are changing because of the move, or it should ask the > user what to do ("do you want to modify the formulas?"). I've added `org-table-fi

[O] Table formula changes are not always necessary when moving rows

2011-02-28 Thread Tom
I have a table in which I sum the values of all rows in the last row: vsum(@1..@-I-1). The problem is when move a row with M-up before the first row (e.g. I press M-up on the second row) then org modifies this formula to vsum(@2..@-I-1). This is not always the expected behavior, because in this ca