Hi,
That does what I want. Thanks for taking the time to explain it. I should
have read the manual on relative cell references more carefully.
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Michael Brand
wrote:
> Hi RCY
>
> On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 17:12, RCY wrote:
> > Sorry not to be clearer.
> > I would li
Hi RCY
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 17:12, RCY wrote:
> Sorry not to be clearer.
> I would like to implement the formula for only one row. So entering the
> first row shown below and implementing the formula with only B entered in
> the first column in the second row gives the rest of the second row.
Hi,
Sorry not to be clearer.
I would like to implement the formula for only one row. So entering the
first row shown below and implementing the formula with only B entered in
the first column in the second row gives the rest of the second row.
|A|2|3|4|
|B|4|6|8|
Your suggestion almost does wh
Hi RCY
Do you want to do this?:
| A | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| B | 4 | 6 | 8 |
| C | 8 | 12 | 16 |
#+TBLFM: @<<$<<..@>$> = 2 * @-1
Michael
In the following table I am trying to implement a row formula for each cell
to be a multiple of the corresponding cell in a preceding row, but several
variations I tried do not work:
| A| 2 | 3 | 4|
| B| [4, 6, 8] | [4, 6, 8] | [4, 6, 8] |
| C| [4, 6, 8] |
