Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Hello,
>
> Nick Dokos writes:
>
>> But since no good deed shall go unpunished, here's another related
>> problem I ran into: with shrunk columns, I add a few more rows to the
>> table with S-RET on the first column, recalculate to populate the
>> added rows and then do
Hello,
Nick Dokos writes:
> But since no good deed shall go unpunished, here's another related
> problem I ran into: with shrunk columns, I add a few more rows to the
> table with S-RET on the first column, recalculate to populate the
> added rows and then do an undo. That undoes the results of
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Hello,
>
> Nick Dokos writes:
>
>> I have a table with column width cookies. I shrink the columns with
>> C-u C-c TAB and then I recalculate with C-c C-c on the #TBLFM
>> line. The columns then get expanded and I have to do the C-u C-c TAB
>> again after every recalcula
Hello,
Nick Dokos writes:
> I have a table with column width cookies. I shrink the columns with
> C-u C-c TAB and then I recalculate with C-c C-c on the #TBLFM
> line. The columns then get expanded and I have to do the C-u C-c TAB
> again after every recalculation. Is there a way to have the col
I have a table with column width cookies. I shrink the columns with
C-u C-c TAB and then I recalculate with C-c C-c on the #TBLFM
line. The columns then get expanded and I have to do the C-u C-c TAB
again after every recalculation. Is there a way to have the columns
stay shrunk?
Example: An unsolv
