Re: [O] Section on #+include keyword is missing quite some info in the org-manual.org

2018-10-04 Thread Kaushal Modi
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 3:25 PM Kaushal Modi wrote: > I was thinking of adding cindices like the ones you added for header > arguments. > > #+cindex: @samp{minlevel}, include > #+cindex: @samp{lines}, include > .. etc. > > Would that be OK? > I went ahead as this wasn't a major edit, and committe

Re: [O] Section on #+include keyword is missing quite some info in the org-manual.org

2018-10-01 Thread Kaushal Modi
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 6:47 AM Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > > This is not intentional. Could you re-introduce the latest revision of > that section? > I was just setting out to fix this in the manual, but I see that you already did this :) I was thinking of adding cindices like the ones you added

Re: [O] Section on #+include keyword is missing quite some info in the org-manual.org

2018-09-26 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Kaushal Modi writes: > I was visiting the Org manual to verify if I got the :only-contents > parameter of #+include keyword correct, and noticed that that info is > completely missing from that section in the new org-manual.org. > > Reverting back to older texi, it is missing pieces like

[O] Section on #+include keyword is missing quite some info in the org-manual.org

2018-09-25 Thread Kaushal Modi
Hello, I was visiting the Org manual to verify if I got the :only-contents parameter of #+include keyword correct, and noticed that that info is completely missing from that section in the new org-manual.org. Reverting back to older texi, it is missing pieces like below and much more too: #+INCL