Neil Jerram writes:
> On 19/12/17 19:30, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
>> I think it would be worth notifying upstream about it, if you have some
>> spare time.
>
> Sure, but which upstream do you mean?
Geiser. Maybe geiser-default-implementation should autoload geiser-impl
or some such.
On 19/12/17 19:30, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
Hello,
Neil Jerram writes:
When I try to evaluate Scheme code in an Emacs where I haven't yet
done any Geiser/Scheme work, I get an error about
geiser-default-implementation being undefined. The attached patch
fixes that, but I am not sure if it is t
Hello,
Neil Jerram writes:
> When I try to evaluate Scheme code in an Emacs where I haven't yet
> done any Geiser/Scheme work, I get an error about
> geiser-default-implementation being undefined. The attached patch
> fixes that, but I am not sure if it is the most minimal fix possible.
> WDYT
When I try to evaluate Scheme code in an Emacs where I haven't yet done
any Geiser/Scheme work, I get an error about
geiser-default-implementation being undefined. The attached patch fixes
that, but I am not sure if it is the most minimal fix possible. WDYT?
Best wishes - Neil
>From adceb0
