Re: [O] Regression bug in tangle/weave

2011-07-10 Thread Eric Schulte
Neeum Zawan writes: > Eric Schulte writes: > >> Hi, >> >> Indeed this example below no longer works, however I believe the new >> behavior is both desired and permanent. I'll explain and include an >> option for how your example could be restructured to work with the new >> code. >> >> We ran i

Re: [O] Regression bug in tangle/weave

2011-07-09 Thread Neeum Zawan
Eric Schulte writes: > Hi, > > Indeed this example below no longer works, however I believe the new > behavior is both desired and permanent. I'll explain and include an > option for how your example could be restructured to work with the new > code. > > We ran into problems automatically removi

Re: [O] Regression bug in tangle/weave

2011-07-05 Thread Eric Schulte
MidLifeXis at PerlMonks writes: > I tested this again over the weekend, and finally understood what you were > saying. > > I put a > > #+resname: blah > : blahcontent > > and then I can use <> to get "blahcontent" replaced without keeping > the newlines. > > Is this "abusing" resname, or is it

Re: [O] Regression bug in tangle/weave

2011-07-05 Thread MidLifeXis at PerlMonks
d?  Will this behavior be stable in the future? Brian - Original Message - From: MidLifeXis at PerlMonks To: Eric Schulte Cc: emacs-orgmode Sent: Friday, July 1, 2011 3:40 PM Subject: Re: [O] Regression bug in tangle/weave I am still getting prompted with the 'Evaluate this tex

Re: [O] Regression bug in tangle/weave

2011-07-01 Thread Eric Schulte
> the weekend and see if that takes care of it. > > Brian > > > > - Original Message - > From: Eric Schulte > To: MidLifeXis at PerlMonks > Cc: emacs-orgmode > Sent: Friday, July 1, 2011 2:14 PM > Subject: Re: [O] Regression bug in tangle/weave > > Yes, the second

Re: [O] Regression bug in tangle/weave

2011-07-01 Thread MidLifeXis at PerlMonks
n two weeks ago.  I will refresh my org-mode setup over the weekend and see if that takes care of it. Brian - Original Message - From: Eric Schulte To: MidLifeXis at PerlMonks Cc: emacs-orgmode Sent: Friday, July 1, 2011 2:14 PM Subject: Re: [O] Regression bug in tangle/weave

Re: [O] Regression bug in tangle/weave

2011-07-01 Thread Eric Schulte
From: Eric Schulte > To: MidLifeXis at PerlMonks > Cc: emacs-orgmode > Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 1:30 PM > Subject: Re: [O] Regression bug in tangle/weave > > Hi, > > Indeed this example below no longer works, however I believe the new > behavior is both desired

Re: [O] Regression bug in tangle/weave

2011-07-01 Thread MidLifeXis at PerlMonks
- From: Eric Schulte To: MidLifeXis at PerlMonks Cc: emacs-orgmode Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 1:30 PM Subject: Re: [O] Regression bug in tangle/weave Hi, Indeed this example below no longer works, however I believe the new behavior is both desired and permanent.  I'll explain and in

Re: [O] Regression bug in tangle/weave

2011-06-30 Thread Eric Schulte
Hi, Indeed this example below no longer works, however I believe the new behavior is both desired and permanent. I'll explain and include an option for how your example could be restructured to work with the new code. We ran into problems automatically removing trailing newlines from code block

[O] Regression bug in tangle/weave

2011-06-30 Thread MidLifeXis at PerlMonks
It appears that there may be a regression problem with the current tangle/weave process.  I used to be able to have a noweb section for the name of the file, another for the version of the file, and then have an autogenerated header section that included those two pieces of information on a sing