Neeum Zawan writes:
> Eric Schulte writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Indeed this example below no longer works, however I believe the new
>> behavior is both desired and permanent. I'll explain and include an
>> option for how your example could be restructured to work with the new
>> code.
>>
>> We ran i
Eric Schulte writes:
> Hi,
>
> Indeed this example below no longer works, however I believe the new
> behavior is both desired and permanent. I'll explain and include an
> option for how your example could be restructured to work with the new
> code.
>
> We ran into problems automatically removi
MidLifeXis at PerlMonks writes:
> I tested this again over the weekend, and finally understood what you were
> saying.
>
> I put a
>
> #+resname: blah
> : blahcontent
>
> and then I can use <> to get "blahcontent" replaced without keeping
> the newlines.
>
> Is this "abusing" resname, or is it
d? Will this
behavior be stable in the future?
Brian
- Original Message -
From: MidLifeXis at PerlMonks
To: Eric Schulte
Cc: emacs-orgmode
Sent: Friday, July 1, 2011 3:40 PM
Subject: Re: [O] Regression bug in tangle/weave
I am still getting prompted with the 'Evaluate this tex
> the weekend and see if that takes care of it.
>
> Brian
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Eric Schulte
> To: MidLifeXis at PerlMonks
> Cc: emacs-orgmode
> Sent: Friday, July 1, 2011 2:14 PM
> Subject: Re: [O] Regression bug in tangle/weave
>
> Yes, the second
n two weeks ago. I will refresh my org-mode setup over
the weekend and see if that takes care of it.
Brian
- Original Message -
From: Eric Schulte
To: MidLifeXis at PerlMonks
Cc: emacs-orgmode
Sent: Friday, July 1, 2011 2:14 PM
Subject: Re: [O] Regression bug in tangle/weave
From: Eric Schulte
> To: MidLifeXis at PerlMonks
> Cc: emacs-orgmode
> Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 1:30 PM
> Subject: Re: [O] Regression bug in tangle/weave
>
> Hi,
>
> Indeed this example below no longer works, however I believe the new
> behavior is both desired
-
From: Eric Schulte
To: MidLifeXis at PerlMonks
Cc: emacs-orgmode
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 1:30 PM
Subject: Re: [O] Regression bug in tangle/weave
Hi,
Indeed this example below no longer works, however I believe the new
behavior is both desired and permanent. I'll explain and in
Hi,
Indeed this example below no longer works, however I believe the new
behavior is both desired and permanent. I'll explain and include an
option for how your example could be restructured to work with the new
code.
We ran into problems automatically removing trailing newlines from code
block
It appears that there may be a regression problem with the current tangle/weave
process. I used to be able to have a noweb section for the name of the file,
another for the version of the file, and then have an autogenerated header
section that included those two pieces of information on a sing
10 matches
Mail list logo