Hi Matt,
Matt Lundin writes:
> Thanks for the new function. However, at the moment, it has destructive
> effects if it is called in a buffer other than the agenda buffer, as it
> appends the new agenda results to the current buffer and then makes the
> buffer read-only.
Thanks for catching thi
harset="utf-8"
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Subject: [O] Re: multiple agenda buffers
> Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2011 01:03:43 -
> From: Matt Lundin
> X-Patchwork-Id: 648
> Message-Id: <87k4ghe1cw@fastmail.fm>
> To: Bastien
>
Hi Matt,
Matt Lundin writes:
> While working on tasks I often need to search for notes relevant to the
> current task. This is not an interruption, but rather a normal part of
> my workflow. In these instances, a separate buffer for search results
> would be exceptionally useful.
Just curious:
Bastien writes:
> Hi Suvayu,
>
> suvayu ali writes:
>
>> I was wondering whether it was possible to have multiple agenda buffers
>> at the same time. My use case is when I want to look for two differnt
>> but related things, or when I want to search while having my daily (or
>> weekly) agenda vi
Hi Bastien,
Bastien writes:
> Hi all,
>
> Suvayu Ali writes:
>
>> However I was wondering, block agenda commands might work at least for
>> doing multiple searches. But I don't think there is any interactive
>> interface to it.
>
> inspired by this conversation, I have add a new agenda command:
