Re: [O] Re: Footnote sorting bug

2011-03-09 Thread Bastien
Matt Lundin writes: > The following patch fixes the sorting bug. It also inserts a blank line > above a new footnote definition, which is consistent with the spacing > that results when sorting footnotes. Applied, thanks. -- Bastien

[Accepted] [O] Re: Footnote sorting bug

2011-03-09 Thread Bastien Guerry
harset="utf-8" > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > Subject: [O] Re: Footnote sorting bug > Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 06:04:00 - > From: Matt Lundin > X-Patchwork-Id: 658 > Message-Id: <8762rul8xr@fastmail.fm> > To: Org Mode > >

[O] Re: Footnote sorting bug

2011-03-07 Thread Matt Lundin
Matt Lundin writes: > Matt Lundin writes: > >> I traced the problem to an extra forward-line added to >> org-footnote-goto-local-insertion-point with commit >> 145109dc4a6f161e4ad826bea9cc970363649280. >> >> The following patch fixes the sorting problem in org buffers. AFAICT, it >> has no effec

[O] Re: Footnote sorting bug

2011-03-07 Thread Matt Lundin
Matt Lundin writes: > I traced the problem to an extra forward-line added to > org-footnote-goto-local-insertion-point with commit > 145109dc4a6f161e4ad826bea9cc970363649280. > > The following patch fixes the sorting problem in org buffers. AFAICT, it > has no effect on footnote insertion in mess