On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Bastien writes:
>
>>> So, my proposal would be that if either are present, Org could
>>> (should?) use html image specifications instead of markdown.
>>
>> I'll let Nicolas decide on this.
>
> FWIW, I think it makes sense to sw
Hello,
Bastien writes:
>> So, my proposal would be that if either are present, Org could
>> (should?) use html image specifications instead of markdown.
>
> I'll let Nicolas decide on this.
FWIW, I think it makes sense to switch to HTML when attributes are
given. Though, I don't use Markdown, s
Hi John,
John Hendy writes:
> So, my proposal would be that if either are present, Org could
> (should?) use html image specifications instead of markdown.
I'll let Nicolas decide on this.
In the meantime, I find the attached patch useful.
It uses the file-name instead of [img] when the image
Hi,
I've been playing around with the ox-md lately and wondered about the
idea of shifting the exported image syntax if any html options are
present. While the markdown file could be changed prior to re-export
to something else, it would seem that specifying options in Org might
imply they want m