Hi Thorsten and Eric,
Eric Schulte writes:
> I don't see that Org-mode itself will ever want to programatically and
> non-interactively insert a code block in an Org-mode file (if fact that
> sounds rather dangerous to me), so I would vote against adding such a
> function to the core.
FWIW +1 h
> So here is my FEATURE REQUEST:
>
> either modify `org-babel-demarcate-block' so that it can be used to
> insert a language-specific code-block (with args?) non-interactively, or
> add something like `org-insert-block' to Org-mode's core. I would prefer
> signature
>
> ,---
Christian Moe writes:
Hi Christian,
> Here's one way, and pointers to more:
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2011-04/msg00406.html
thanks for the links.
I mean, it is not t difficult to write a function like
,--
|
Hi, Thorsten,
Here's one way, and pointers to more:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2011-04/msg00406.html
Yours,
Christian
Thorsten Jolitz writes:
> Hi List,
>
> it probably a command everybody knows, but I looked for it several times
> and just missed it: 'insert a source-blo
Hi List,
it probably a command everybody knows, but I looked for it several times
and just missed it: 'insert a source-block'.
I know about Chap. 15.2. of the manual (Easy Templates), thats not what
I mean. To reformulate my question:
Why doesn't (the most relevant function I have found)
,-
