Bonjour François,
pin...@iro.umontreal.ca (François Pinard) writes:
> Bastien writes:
>
>> Hi François,
>
> Bonjour, Bastien!
>
>>> I added "Du " as a prefix to get going, but the ideal would be to
>>> directly use 2012-02-29 as the link description. Is there a way, or is
>>> it a limitation (o
Bastien writes:
> Hi François,
Bonjour, Bastien!
>> I added "Du " as a prefix to get going, but the ideal would be to
>> directly use 2012-02-29 as the link description. Is there a way, or is
>> it a limitation (or a bug)?
> I would call it a limitation.
Could it be documented somewhere appr
Hi François,
pin...@iro.umontreal.ca (François Pinard) writes:
> I added "Du " as a prefix to get going, but the ideal would be to
> directly use 2012-02-29 as the link description. Is there a way, or is
> it a limitation (or a bug)?
I would call it a limitation.
--
Bastien
François Pinard wrote:
>
> Given the following header contents:
>
> * Problème date
> - [[file:2012-02-29.org::*Notes][2012-02-29]]
> - [[file:2012-02-29.org::*Notes][Du 2012-02-29]]
>
> here is how it is shown in the Web browser after publishing:
>
>
> I added "Du " as a prefix to get going
Given the following header contents:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
* Problème date
- [[file:2012-02-29.org::*Notes][2012-02-29]]
- [[file:2012-02-29.org::*Notes][Du 2012-02-29]]
--8<---cut here---end--->8---
here is how it i