Re: [O] Problem with [xxx] inside a footnote

2011-04-11 Thread Alan L Tyree
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 12:39:48 +0200 Giovanni Ridolfi wrote: > Alan L Tyree writes: > > > Hello Orgsters, > > > > [fn:1: Although this risk is usually negligible, bank cheques are > > not "the same as cash": see Sidney Raper Pty Ltd v Commonwealth > > Trading Bank of Australia [1975] 2 NSWLR 227;

Re: [O] Problem with [xxx] inside a footnote

2011-04-11 Thread Giovanni Ridolfi
Alan L Tyree writes: > Hello Orgsters, > > [fn:1: Although this risk is usually negligible, bank cheques are not > "the same as cash": see Sidney Raper Pty Ltd v Commonwealth Trading > Bank of Australia [1975] 2 NSWLR 227; Justin Seward Pty Ltd v > Commissioner of Rural and Industries Bank > (198

[O] Problem with [xxx] inside a footnote

2011-04-10 Thread Alan L Tyree
Hello Orgsters, I don't know if this is a bug, but it is a problem for me. I have the following footnote: [fn:1: Although this risk is usually negligible, bank cheques are not "the same as cash": see Sidney Raper Pty Ltd v Commonwealth Trading Bank of Australia [1975] 2 NSWLR 227; Justin Seward P