Hi Achim,
Achim Gratz writes:
> Bastien writes:
>> Achim Gratz writes:
>>> Shouldn't the test check that the desired target is actually
>>> reached?
>>
>> That would be too complicated. Checking that `org-open-at-point'
>> does not throw an error is enough IMO.
>
> I don't think so. Implement
Bastien writes:
> Achim Gratz writes:
>> Shouldn't the test check that the desired target is actually
>> reached?
>
> That would be too complicated. Checking that `org-open-at-point'
> does not throw an error is enough IMO.
I don't think so. Implemented a check for that in 8e72c8fcfa.
Regards
Achim Gratz writes:
> York Zhao writes:
>> Thank you very much for implementing this. Really appreciated. So do you
>> think
>> it is a good idea to add my test (the patch) now for testing this?
>
> Shouldn't the test check that the desired target is actually
> reached?
That would be too compli
York Zhao writes:
> Thank you very much for implementing this. Really appreciated. So do you think
> it is a good idea to add my test (the patch) now for testing this?
Shouldn't the test check that the desired target is actually reached?
Regards,
Achim.
--
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron mic
Hi York,
York Zhao writes:
> Thank you very much for implementing this. Really appreciated. So do you think
> it is a good idea to add my test (the patch) now for testing this?
Yes.
> For your convenience, I've attached again in this message the same patch I had
> sent on April 10.
Installed,
Hi Bastien,
Thank you very much for implementing this. Really appreciated. So do you think
it is a good idea to add my test (the patch) now for testing this?
For your convenience, I've attached again in this message the same patch I had
sent on April 10.
Thanks,
York
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 3
Hi Bastien,
I apologize that I missed your reply, I discovered it until now when I was
checking the replies in the "Sent" folder.
> The question is this: are we fine handling raw links in properties,
> or do we also need Org links (e.g. bracket links) there?
To me, raw link is hardly useful beca
Hi Bastien,
On 2014-04-17, Bastien wrote:
> The question is this: are we fine handling raw links in properties,
> or do we also need Org links (e.g. bracket links) there?
>
> Speaking for me, raw links is enough, and this is what I plan to
> implement. But maybe other users have existing use-case
Hi York,
York Zhao writes:
> * Peter
> :PROPERTIES:
> :ADDRESS: xxx xxx
> :HOME_PHONE: xxx xxx xxx
> :WORK_PHONE: xxx xxx xxx
> :URL: www.foo.bar
> :END:
The question is this: are we fine handling raw links in properties,
or do we also need Org links (e.g. bracket links) there?
Speak
Hi Bastien,
Sorry that I didn't know this was a known issue and I appreciate that you are
willing to fix it.
While I agree with Nicolas that it is more appropriate to keep org schedule line
from being a headline property, I also think it is totally legitimate to have an
org link as headline prope
Hi York,
York Zhao writes:
> I found a bug that `org-open-at-point' doesn't work if the link is a
> heading property.
This is a known issue and we will address it soon.
> This used to work and was broken recently. I have written a test for
> this. The test is suppose to fail in current org-mod
Hello,
York Zhao writes:
> I found a bug that `org-open-at-point' doesn't work if the link is a heading
> property.
This is expected, as node properties cannot contain Org syntax. See
also
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/84300
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
Hi,
I found a bug that `org-open-at-point' doesn't work if the link is a heading
property. This used to work and was broken recently. I have written a test for
this. The test is suppose to fail in current org-mode version. Please find
attached my patch for the test. Hopefully I I didn't place the
13 matches
Mail list logo
