Carsten Dominik writes:
> On 21.10.2011, at 10:54, Christian Egli wrote:
>
>> Hi Carsten
>>
>> Carsten Dominik writes:
>>
>>> I have just checked in a slightly modified patch.
>>
>> I think there is a problem with this checkin. The variable
>> org-agenda-move-date-from-past-immediately-to-tod
On 21.10.2011, at 10:54, Christian Egli wrote:
> Hi Carsten
>
> Carsten Dominik writes:
>
>> I have just checked in a slightly modified patch.
>
> I think there is a problem with this checkin. The variable
> org-agenda-move-date-from-past-immediately-to-today is not defined.
> Should this be
On 22.10.2011, at 08:00, Niels Giesen wrote:
> Same here.
>
> By the way, you don't necessarily have to mark the patch as a TINYCHANGE: I
> have signed the papers with the FSF, but I just have problems updating
> http://orgmode.org/worg/org-contribute.html.
>
> (problem is: "error: unable to
Same here.
By the way, you don't necessarily have to mark the patch as a TINYCHANGE: I
have signed the papers with the FSF, but I just have problems updating
http://orgmode.org/worg/org-contribute.html.
(problem is: "error: unable to create temporary sha1 filename ./objects/3e:
Permission denied"
Hi Carsten
Carsten Dominik writes:
> I have just checked in a slightly modified patch.
I think there is a problem with this checkin. The variable
org-agenda-move-date-from-past-immediately-to-today is not defined.
Should this be a defcustom somewhere?
Debugger entered--Lisp error: (void-variab
I have just checked in a slightly modified patch.
Thanks, this was really a bug.
- Carsten
On Oct 17, 2011, at 10:50 AM, Niels Giesen wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Nick Dokos wrote:
> Niels Giesen wrote:
>
> > *bump*
> >
> > Has this one slipped through (as I were posting t
Never mind resubmitting, I will take a look at the patch later today.
- Carsten
On Oct 17, 2011, at 10:50 AM, Niels Giesen wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Nick Dokos wrote:
> Niels Giesen wrote:
>
> > *bump*
> >
> > Has this one slipped through (as I were posting two other pat
Niels Giesen wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Nick Dokos wrote:
>
> Niels Giesen wrote:
>
> > *bump*
> >
> > Has this one slipped through (as I were posting two other patches round
> the same date, one also
> > having to do with date/time ranges in the agenda
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Nick Dokos wrote:
> Niels Giesen wrote:
>
> > *bump*
> >
> > Has this one slipped through (as I were posting two other patches round
> the same date, one also
> > having to do with date/time ranges in the agenda -- which were both
> accepted), or am I just
> > im
Niels Giesen wrote:
> *bump*
>
> Has this one slipped through (as I were posting two other patches round the
> same date, one also
> having to do with date/time ranges in the agenda -- which were both
> accepted), or am I just
> impatient?
>
I tried to check patchwork (http://patchwork.newar
*bump*
Has this one slipped through (as I were posting two other patches round the
same date, one also having to do with date/time ranges in the agenda --
which were both accepted), or am I just impatient?
On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Niels Giesen wrote:
> Hi Orgers,
>
> The discussion in th
Hi Orgers,
The discussion in the recent thread "Time range end in agenda view not
displayed" prompted me to take a closer look at time/date ranges in the
Agenda view. I noticed that the commands `org-agenda-do-date-later' and
`org-agenda-do-date-earlier' do not work correctly on timestamp ranges,
12 matches
Mail list logo
