Hi Nicolas
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 10:42 PM, Nicolas Goaziou
wrote:
> I didn't test logging, but `org-skip-over-state-notes' definitely goes
> past the three items, so I guess `org-log-beginning' should put point at
> the end of the three items, too.
Indeed, it works all as expected. Thank you!
Michael Brand writes:
> I still get the new log in the middle line with
> release_9.1.13-757-g463664b after restarting Emacs. Did you get the
> new log after the last line?
I didn't test logging, but `org-skip-over-state-notes' definitely goes
past the three items, so I guess `org-log-beginning'
Hi
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 10:08 PM, Nicolas Goaziou
wrote:
> You are right. It should be empty, not "". I think I fixed it in maint.
I still get the new log in the middle line with
release_9.1.13-757-g463664b after restarting Emacs. Did you get the
new log after the last line?
Michael
Hello,
Michael Brand writes:
> I don't see this happen: When starting with this (the % and the
> ordering of the lines have been edited manually)
>
> - State "DONE" from "TODO" [2018-05-15 Tue 10:00]
> - State "DONE" from "%" [2018-05-15 Tue 10:00]
> - State "DONE"
Hi Nicolas
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 9:07 PM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Michael Brand writes:
>
>> There seems to be an inconsistency in parsing. When
>> org-log-states-order-reversed is nil (which I am new to) and a TODO
>> with the manually written state log lines
>>
>> - State "DONE"
Hello,
Michael Brand writes:
> There seems to be an inconsistency in parsing. When
> org-log-states-order-reversed is nil (which I am new to) and a TODO
> with the manually written state log lines
>
> - State "DONE" from "TODO" [2018-05-12 Sat]
> - State "DONE" from
Hi all
There seems to be an inconsistency in parsing. When
org-log-states-order-reversed is nil (which I am new to) and a TODO
with the manually written state log lines
- State "DONE" from "TODO" [2018-05-12 Sat]
- State "DONE" from [2018-05-13 Sun]
- State "DONE"
