On Tuesday, 15 Mar 2016 at 13:07, Eduardo Mercovich wrote:
[...]
> It is exactly as you said, valid. However, and I may be getting
> something else incorrectly, pdflatex has problems with those as it works
> out of the box (C-c C-e l o in org), since internal links are broken and
> the ToC is not
Dear Eric.
> [...]
>> Being a total newbie I can't say that the resulting syntax is incorrect
>> (is it?), but at least in the case of latex, *not expressing this
>> specific option creates a non-functional latex file*. [...]
> The * between section and the brace indicates an unnumbered section
>
Dear Nicolas.
>> Being a total newbie I can't say that the resulting syntax is incorrect
>> (is it?), but at least in the case of latex, *not expressing this
>> specific option creates a non-functional latex file*.
>> Shouldn't the exporter take care of this? Or at least, never export the
>> ast
On Tuesday, 8 Mar 2016 at 09:30, Eduardo Mercovich wrote:
[...]
> Being a total newbie I can't say that the resulting syntax is incorrect
> (is it?), but at least in the case of latex, *not expressing this
> specific option creates a non-functional latex file*.
>
> Shouldn't the exporter take c
Hello,
Eduardo Mercovich writes:
> Being a total newbie I can't say that the resulting syntax is incorrect
> (is it?), but at least in the case of latex, *not expressing this
> specific option creates a non-functional latex file*.
>
> Shouldn't the exporter take care of this? Or at least, never
Dear Eric.
Troubleshooting a lack of ToC content in a exported PDF from org, I
found this issue. [...]
>>> Make sure you have
>>> #+options: num:t
>>> set. Otherwise, sections are unnumbered. I'm not sure what the default
>>> is. Maybe you have "num:nil"?
>> I had nothing in the doc
On Friday, 4 Mar 2016 at 18:26, Eduardo Mercovich wrote:
> Hi Eric.
>
>>> Troubleshooting a lack of ToC content in a exported PDF from org, I
>>> found this issue. [...]
>
>> Make sure you have
>> #+options: num:t
>> set. Otherwise, sections are unnumbered. I'm not sure what the default
>> is.
Hi Eric.
>> Troubleshooting a lack of ToC content in a exported PDF from org, I
>> found this issue. [...]
> Make sure you have
> #+options: num:t
> set. Otherwise, sections are unnumbered. I'm not sure what the default
> is. Maybe you have "num:nil"?
I had nothing in the document, and your s
On Friday, 4 Mar 2016 at 16:15, Eduardo Mercovich wrote:
> Hello evoryone.
>
> Troubleshooting a lack of ToC content in a exported PDF from org, I
> found this issue.
Make sure you have
#+options: num:t
set. Otherwise, sections are unnumbered. I'm not sure what the default
is. Maybe you have
Hello evoryone.
Troubleshooting a lack of ToC content in a exported PDF from org, I
found this issue.
Please forgive me if it's inaccurate. But I tried searching the web,
some org and latex lists and my local .emacs configuration and didn't
found anything related, so it must be a local issue or i
10 matches
Mail list logo