Hehe ;) No, I was merely suggesting that maybe someone tried too hard to
fix non-working urls becauase of other use cases.
Luckily it seems fixed now.
On 03/06/2014 10:17 AM, Andreas Leha wrote:
"R. Michael Weylandt" writes:
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Simon Thum wrote:
This seems to
"R. Michael Weylandt" writes:
> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Simon Thum wrote:
>> This seems to be a question of objective. Do you want to encode, i.e.
>> maintain some reversible original in an url no matter what, or do you want
>> to fix url's which wouldn't otherwise be legal? In the latte
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Simon Thum wrote:
> This seems to be a question of objective. Do you want to encode, i.e.
> maintain some reversible original in an url no matter what, or do you want
> to fix url's which wouldn't otherwise be legal? In the latter case, the
> question mark should pr
This seems to be a question of objective. Do you want to encode, i.e.
maintain some reversible original in an url no matter what, or do you
want to fix url's which wouldn't otherwise be legal? In the latter case,
the question mark should probably be retained.
On 03/03/2014 09:06 PM, R. Michael
On Feb 28, 2014, at 15:26, Andreas Leha
wrote:
> "R. Michael Weylandt "
> writes:
>
>> I've tried this with Org 7.9.3 and 8.2.5h to the same result:
>>
>> <-->
>> #+TITLE: Test
>> * One
>> Here is a [[http://google.com/search?q=orgmode][link]]
>> <-->
