Re: [O] More flyspell-overlays removed

2012-08-07 Thread Jeffrey Spencer
Re-dl'ed and works fine. Sorry about that. On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 7:18 PM, Bastien wrote: > Hi Jeffrey, > > Jeffrey Spencer writes: > > > Just gave this a go and seems to work well but still forgot to add I > > believe: > > > > TYP_TODO > > and > > ATTR_LATEX > > The two words above are already

Re: [O] More flyspell-overlays removed

2012-08-07 Thread Bastien
Hi Jeffrey, Jeffrey Spencer writes: > Just gave this a go and seems to work well but still forgot to add I > believe: > > TYP_TODO > and > ATTR_LATEX The two words above are already skipped for me. -- Bastien

Re: [O] More flyspell-overlays removed

2012-08-06 Thread Jeffrey Spencer
Just gave this a go and seems to work well but still forgot to add I believe: TYP_TODO and ATTR_LATEX Cheers, Jeff On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 1:32 AM, Bastien wrote: > > > "Sebastien Vauban" > writes: > > > I would allow fly-prog-mode in the listins, as one normally does for > plain > > code, no?

Re: [O] More flyspell-overlays removed

2012-07-31 Thread Bastien
"Sebastien Vauban" writes: > I would allow fly-prog-mode in the listins, as one normally does for plain > code, no? This is indeed the case right now. -- Bastien

Re: [O] More flyspell-overlays removed

2012-07-31 Thread Bastien
Bjarte Johansen writes: > It seems to not work for #+LATEX_CLASS_OPTIONS, maybe because of the > two _ ? It works for me when I use M-x flyspell-mode RET. Can you provide a step-by-step way of reproducing the problem? -- Bastien

Re: [O] More flyspell-overlays removed

2012-07-31 Thread Bjarte Johansen
On 31 Jul, 2012, at 17:32 , Bastien wrote: > Bjarte Johansen writes: > >> On 30 Jul, 2012, at 13:03 , Bastien wrote: >> >>> I've pushed a fix which should let flyspell ignore more commonly >>> used Org keywords. Please test it. >> >> This works great. You forgot #+LATEX_CLASS_OPTIONS: tho

Re: [O] More flyspell-overlays removed

2012-07-31 Thread Bastien
Bjarte Johansen writes: > On 30 Jul, 2012, at 13:03 , Bastien wrote: > >> I've pushed a fix which should let flyspell ignore more commonly >> used Org keywords. Please test it. > > This works great. You forgot #+LATEX_CLASS_OPTIONS: though. Nope. `org-additional-option-like-keywords-for-fl

Re: [O] More flyspell-overlays removed

2012-07-31 Thread Sebastien Vauban
Hi Bjarte, Bjarte Johansen wrote: > So I won't be able to work on this before next weekend, but in the mean time > (unless someone else has the time) I suggest that we make a list of places > where we would like to remove flyspell overlays from. I'll start. > > #+STARTUP > #+OPTIONS > #+LATEX_CLAS

Re: [O] More flyspell-overlays removed

2012-07-31 Thread Jeffrey Spencer
I don't have any problem with natbib cite commands including \ref, \cite, \citet, \citep, etc Maybe your version of flyspell?? But it should act exactly as it does in auctex or your latex mode of emacs. I would check in there if it works properly because should parse the same way if not maybe

Re: [O] More flyspell-overlays removed

2012-07-30 Thread Bjarte Johansen
On 30 Jul, 2012, at 13:03 , Bastien wrote: > I've pushed a fix which should let flyspell ignore more commonly > used Org keywords. Please test it. This works great. You forgot #+LATEX_CLASS_OPTIONS: though. On 30 Jul, 2012, at 13:13 , Jeffrey Spencer wrote: > Will give it a test later in

Re: [O] More flyspell-overlays removed

2012-07-30 Thread Jeffrey Spencer
Will give it a test later in the week and let you know. Also you can add this hook to make it act like the fly-spell mode in auctex (if familiar with that) which skips most tex based commands (trips up though if you have only one $ because assumes another $ sign later so won't check spelling in th

Re: [O] More flyspell-overlays removed

2012-07-30 Thread Bastien
I've pushed a fix which should let flyspell ignore more commonly used Org keywords. Please test it. Thanks! -- Bastien

Re: [O] More flyspell-overlays removed

2012-07-29 Thread Bjarte Johansen
On 29 Jul, 2012, at 10:35 , Jeffrey Spencer wrote: > I was also thinking about this recently but hadn't gotten as far as writing a > patch. > > I was thinking some tags you know you want to remove the fly-spell overlays > but for example caption you might or might not want the flyspell overla

Re: [O] More flyspell-overlays removed

2012-07-29 Thread Jeffrey Spencer
I was also thinking about this recently but hadn't gotten as far as writing a patch. I was thinking some tags you know you want to remove the fly-spell overlays but for example caption you might or might not want the flyspell overlays removed. If there was a variable that could be set to choose so

Re: [O] More flyspell-overlays removed

2012-07-28 Thread Bjarte Johansen
On 28 Jul, 2012, at 11:27 , Bastien wrote: > I cannot apply it because it adds keywords at the wrong place. > For example you cannot add "startup:" in the first (cond ((...))) > because "startup:" is not a "backend specific content." And some > other discrepencies. OK, I understand. I should

Re: [O] More flyspell-overlays removed

2012-07-28 Thread Bastien
Hi Bjarte, Bjarte Johansen writes: > I made a patch to remove some more flyspell-overlays in #-blocks. The > reason for no : in the latex_header is that for some reason the : does > not get captured in dc1. flyspell is also removed for the full > verbatim, lstlisting and src blocks. > > I hope y

[O] More flyspell-overlays removed

2012-07-20 Thread Bjarte Johansen
Hi - I made a patch to remove some more flyspell-overlays in #-blocks. The reason for no : in the latex_header is that for some reason the : does not get captured in dc1. flyspell is also removed for the full verbatim, lstlisting and src blocks. I hope you guys can use the patch. Regards, Bja