Re: [O] Language identifiers

2012-05-22 Thread Bastien
Hi François, François Pinard writes: > A good way to study the > new exporter's opinion would be for me to write a Python parser which > yields exactly the same analysis. That parser could usefully replace > many Python scripts here which decipher Org files according to my mental > fuzzy approx

Re: [O] Language identifiers

2012-05-21 Thread François Pinard
Nick Dokos writes: >> If the real source of the manual was in Org format, and periodically and >> mechanically turned into a Texinfo file, would the requirement be met? > Yes, but somebody would have to write a good texinfo exporter. Oh! I did not even know that none exist yet. Well, indeed,

Re: [O] Language identifiers

2012-05-21 Thread Eric Schulte
> > - The identifier in the left column did not work, but if I change it to > the identifier in the right column, the content highlights (in > Emacs). The manual does not list it. > > | config | conf | > | email | mail | > | make | makefile | > | postscript | ps

Re: [O] Language identifiers

2012-05-21 Thread Nick Dokos
François Pinard wrote: > Nick Dokos writes: > > > François Pinard wrote: > > >> If I had to do this, I would search around to see if there is an Org to > >> Texinfo exporter, and then blindly / fully rely on it to do various > >> wonders automatically! ;-) I did not check, but presume that th

Re: [O] Language identifiers

2012-05-21 Thread François Pinard
Nick Dokos writes: > François Pinard wrote: >> If I had to do this, I would search around to see if there is an Org to >> Texinfo exporter, and then blindly / fully rely on it to do various >> wonders automatically! ;-) I did not check, but presume that the current >> manual original is directl

Re: [O] Language identifiers

2012-05-21 Thread Sebastien Vauban
Hi François and all, François Pinard wrote: > - I was using lower case "c" and "r", while the manual suggests > upper case "C" and "R" instead. Both seem to work (in Emacs at > least). Should the manual be amended to say that case does not > matter? If then, should the manual stick unifor

Re: [O] Language identifiers

2012-05-20 Thread Nick Dokos
François Pinard wrote: > If I had to do this, I would search around to see if there is an Org to > Texinfo exporter, and then blindly / fully rely on it to do various > wonders automatically! ;-) I did not check, but presume that the current > manual original is directly written in Texinfo? > Th

Re: [O] Language identifiers

2012-05-20 Thread François Pinard
t...@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) writes: > Aloha François, :-) > Do you know how to do this in texinfo? If I had to do this, I would search around to see if there is an Org to Texinfo exporter, and then blindly / fully rely on it to do various wonders automatically! ;-) I did not check, but presu

Re: [O] Language identifiers

2012-05-20 Thread Thomas S. Dye
Aloha François, François Pinard writes: > Hello, Org people. > > Seeing again the (org) Languages node in the manual, I decided to check > all my #+BEGIN_SRC for language tags, which I too often improvise, for > normalizing them. I noticed a few things, and wonder if the manual > should be amen

[O] Language identifiers

2012-05-20 Thread François Pinard
Hello, Org people. Seeing again the (org) Languages node in the manual, I decided to check all my #+BEGIN_SRC for language tags, which I too often improvise, for normalizing them. I noticed a few things, and wonder if the manual should be amended, or if I should change my habits instead. - I was