Re: [O] Is there any orgmode ChangeLog workalike (with enhancements)?

I am using org-mode installed by the emacs package system: org-plus-contrib. I just updated it this morning: Org mode version 9.2.6 (9.2.6-elpaplus @ /usr/share/emacs/27.0.50/lisp/org/) I have no trouble, so far, running this template. If it is of interest, I am using this also in directories i

Re: [O] Is there any orgmode ChangeLog workalike (with enhancements)?

>>> "AED" == Alan E Davis writes: > I have come up with something simple that works: > ("X" "ChangeLog README" entry (file+datetree "./00_README.org") "* %? > \n %U \n %f" :prepend t) Thanks I tried this and I obtain Deprecated date/weektree capture templates changed to ‘file+ol

Re: [O] Is there any orgmode ChangeLog workalike (with enhancements)?

> Alan E Davis writes: > I have come up with something simple that works: ("X" "ChangeLog > README" entry (file+datetree "./00_README.org") "* %? \n %U \n > %f" :prepend t) This is a nice solution. Depending on the your version of org-mode, you may get a depreciation warning on

Re: [O] Is there any orgmode ChangeLog workalike (with enhancements)?

I have come up with something simple that works: ("X" "ChangeLog README" entry (file+datetree "./00_README.org") "* %? \n %U \n %f" :prepend t) It looks like it will grow quickly into a long file, with four lines for each entry. For now, it's exactly what I needed. Proof of my instinct th

[O] Is there any orgmode ChangeLog workalike (with enhancements)?

[I posted almost this exact message to emacs-help by mistake.] Many times I have envisioned having an org-mode function that works similarly to ChangeLog, to save notes as something like a 00_README.org file in-place, in any directory in which I am working. Maybe my imagination has just escaped

Re: [O] Is is possible to summarize contents of a task in the agenda headings?

This post doesn't seem to be exactly what you want, but it might have some details to help you modify the org-agenda view to your liking. https://www.reddit.com/r/emacs/comments/8wohqz/completely_custom_orgagenda_with_support_for_gtd/ Cheers, -- Adrian Bradd

Re: [O] Is is possible to summarize contents of a task in the agenda headings?

Hello, I made some progress. I can generate agendas where each todo shows how many sub-tasks it has: Emacs ideas < 3> Emacs: TODO [#0] show context of subtasks in agenda < 1> Emacs: TODO [#0] fixate gnus structure < 1> Emacs: TODO [#2] kungsgetens

Re: [O] Is is possible to summarize contents of a task in the agenda headings?

writes: > Thanks, I'm already using (setq org-agenda-todo-list-sublevels nil) and > org-super-agenda. Both reduce clutter which is good. OTOH I now lack > information about subtasks that has been removed from the agenda > view. It is this concern i would like to address. A bit of work, but, if y

Re: [O] Is is possible to summarize contents of a task in the agenda headings?

David Masterson writes: > writes: > >> Say I have a bunch of tasks like this: >> >> * TODO task with many subtasks >> ** TODO subtask 1 >> ** TODO subtask 2 >> * TODO another task with many subtasks >> ** TODO another subtask 1 >> ** TODO another subtask 2 >> >> And so on. >> >> Now, in the agen

Re: [O] Is is possible to summarize contents of a task in the agenda headings?

writes: > Say I have a bunch of tasks like this: > > * TODO task with many subtasks > ** TODO subtask 1 > ** TODO subtask 2 > * TODO another task with many subtasks > ** TODO another subtask 1 > ** TODO another subtask 2 > > And so on. > > Now, in the agenda, I would like some kind of summarizing

[O] Is is possible to summarize contents of a task in the agenda headings?

Say I have a bunch of tasks like this: * TODO task with many subtasks ** TODO subtask 1 ** TODO subtask 2 * TODO another task with many subtasks ** TODO another subtask 1 ** TODO another subtask 2 And so on. Now, in the agenda, I would like some kind of summarizing, perhaps like: * TODO task wi

[O] Is there a addon or corefunctionality that helps with e.g. clock-tables?

Whenever I want to work with a clock-table I have to open up https://orgmode.org/manual/The-clock-table.html and look at the options that clock-table supports. It would be great to have a simple ui e.g. like magit or deadgrep that can be opened for a clocktable and change the settings. kind regar

[O] Is it possible for the archive file to mirror the structure of the original file?

Hi all, I'd like, when archiving e.g. the "Whatever" headline in this example: * A header ** A subheader *** Whatever to automatically create a similar structure (i.e., "A header", "A subheader" and "Whatever" as headlines of levels 1, 2, 3 respectively) in the archive file. Is that possible?

Re: [O] Is it normal for 'Org Cycle Hook' to be "CHANGED outside Customize" by '(require 'org-inlinetask)'

Hello, alain.coch...@unistra.fr writes: > Hello -- > > I run: > > emacs -Q -l mini-init.el > > with mini-init.el being > > (add-to-list 'load-path "/home/cochard/.emacs.d/elpa/org-20180521/") > (require 'org-inlinetask) > > Then I do 'M-x customize-group org ', then search for > 'cycle',

[O] Is it normal for 'Org Cycle Hook' to be "CHANGED outside Customize" by '(require 'org-inlinetask)'

Hello -- I run: emacs -Q -l mini-init.el with mini-init.el being (add-to-list 'load-path "/home/cochard/.emacs.d/elpa/org-20180521/") (require 'org-inlinetask) Then I do 'M-x customize-group org ', then search for 'cycle', go to 'Org Cycle Hook', and see: Hide Org Cycle Hook: INS

Re: [O] Is it possible to "escape" time entries in to-do headings for org-agenda?

Rohit Patnaik writes: > I managed to get my question answered on StackExchange [1]. It seems > the solution is to turn off org-agenda-search-headline-for-time. Would > it be possible to add a footnote to the time of day specification > manual page [2] indicating that this is the variable that con

Re: [O] Is it possible to "escape" time entries in to-do headings for org-agenda?

I managed to get my question answered on StackExchange [1]. It seems the solution is to turn off org-agenda-search-headline-for-time. Would it be possible to add a footnote to the time of day specification manual page [2] indicating that this is the variable that controls whether org-agenda scan

Re: [O] Is it possible to "escape" time entries in to-do headings for org-agenda?

Hello, Rohit Patnaik writes: > Hello, > > According to the org-mode manual: > >>In the headline of the entry itself, a time(range) may also appear as plain >>text (like ‘12:45’ or a ‘8:30-1pm’). > > Is it possible to "escape" this text so that strings like that are > *not* interpreted as times

[O] Is it possible to "escape" time entries in to-do headings for org-agenda?

Hello, According to the org-mode manual: >In the headline of the entry itself, a time(range) may also appear as plain >text (like ‘12:45’ or a ‘8:30-1pm’). Is it possible to "escape" this text so that strings like that are *not* interpreted as times or time ranges? Failing that, is it possible

Re: [O] Is it possible to add a :results type for ob-shell to interpret it's some special characters?

I found new possible solution: comint-based modes like shell-mode use functions in hook. Like - ansi-color-process-output And I found similar project "xterm-color": https://github.com/atomontage/xterm-color I can't implement it on Org-moderesult processing. But someone might be interested t

[O] Is it possible to add a :results type for ob-shell to interpret it's some special characters?

When I have following src block #+begin_src shell :dir /sudo:: sudo pacman -S --noconfirm lilypond #+end_src It will display result literately. include "^M". I wish org-mode (or ob-shell) can add a result type like `:results term` (maybe other name) to replace those "^M" etc special characters

Re: [O] is there a macro to have backend-specific behavior?

> Is there a way to define a macro that has different behaviors depending > on export backend? I have macros that use the @@latex:foo@@ syntax, but > in that case I "foo" is supposed to be literal latex. Perhaps this might do something similar to what you expect: --8<---cut here-

Re: [O] Is the ELPA repo for orgmode working?

I get this all the time on a Windows CI build (Appveyor). I think the problem is related to out of date ssl/gnutls libs, and maybe an update on emacs would fix it. I don't have a Windows machine to test this, but someone else has been documenting some of the issues and at least partial solutions a

[O] Is the ELPA repo for orgmode working?

Hi, Following instructions on https://orgmode.org/elpa.html, when I list-packages, I see the following in *Messages* Importing package-keyring.gpg...done Opening TLS connection to ‘orgmode.org’... Opening TLS connection with ‘gnutls-cli --x509cafile /etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt -p 443 org

Re: [O] is ascii link format canonical? can it be made more linkifiable?

Hello, Samuel Wales writes: > after i posted, i remembered that some sites, including blogger or > wordpress, will not linkify in their comments, but will > linkify bare links [and who knows what else]. > > so i'm thinking the ability to specify the brackets would be useful. You can use a filt

Re: [O] is ascii link format canonical? can it be made more linkifiable?

On 2/10/18, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: >> 1] seemingly, notes are not created. > > This is expected. You wouldn't want to create an empty note, would you? i think it is ok to not make notes. you could in principle make numbered notes. >> can this be customized so that the link can be exported total

Re: [O] is ascii link format canonical? can it be made more linkifiable?

Hello, Samuel Wales writes: > recent maint. > > org-ascii-links-to-notes is t. > > i am exporting bare links that look in the source like > > http://whatever.com > > 1] seemingly, notes are not created. This is expected. You wouldn't want to create an empty note, would you? > actually i don'

Re: [O] is ascii link format canonical? can it be made more linkifiable?

On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 09:26:14PM -0700, Samuel Wales wrote: > > [[http://whatever.com]] > > i do not know the standard, but i think that some email clients will > not linkify this because of the brackets. Correct. > are we sure that [] are canonical? not <>? is it the clients that > are w

[O] is ascii link format canonical? can it be made more linkifiable?

recent maint. org-ascii-links-to-notes is t. i am exporting bare links that look in the source like http://whatever.com 1] seemingly, notes are not created. actually i don't mind this, because i don't want notes in this case. 2] the links get exported like [http://whatever.com] i get th

Re: [O] is there a macro to have backend-specific behavior?

On 2018-02-01 13:02, Nicolas Goaziou writes: >> My use case is this one: I have a link to a custom id, and I want to >> export it as [[#id]] in latex and [[file:file.org::#id]] for html >> *before* link resolution happens (so that the custom id in the latex >> export is substituted with the corre

Re: [O] is there a macro to have backend-specific behavior?

Hello, Alan Schmitt writes: > Is there a way to define a macro that has different behaviors depending > on export backend? I have macros that use the @@latex:foo@@ syntax, but > in that case I "foo" is supposed to be literal latex. > > My use case is this one: I have a link to a custom id, and I

[O] is there a macro to have backend-specific behavior?

Hello, Is there a way to define a macro that has different behaviors depending on export backend? I have macros that use the @@latex:foo@@ syntax, but in that case I "foo" is supposed to be literal latex. My use case is this one: I have a link to a custom id, and I want to export it as [[#id]] in

Re: [O] is there a plan to move org elpa from http to https?

thanks. good to know. Best,

Re: [O] is there a plan to move org elpa from http to https?

On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 12:59 AM Shiyao MA wrote: > Hi, > > is there a plan to move org elpa from http to https? > It's already https: https://orgmode.org/elpa/ I believe the site referencing installation via melpa needs to be updated: https://orgmode.org/elpa.html. -- Kaushal Modi

[O] is there a plan to move org elpa from http to https?

Hi, is there a plan to move org elpa from http to https? -- Best, Shiyao

Re: [O] Is there a way to get all agenda TODOs programmatically?

Nicolas Goaziou writes: >> I have some more code you might find useful. I had an idea to take a >> different approach with my org-agenda-ng code (not using org-element to >> parse the whole buffer first), and it seems to be working well so far. > > Clearly, `org-element-parse-buffer' is not adeq

Re: [O] Is there a way to get all agenda TODOs programmatically?

Forgive the self reply, but I just made a change which makes the code much more pleasant. The matching functions are bound internally during matching, so instead of: (org-agenda-ng--agenda :files org-agenda-files :pred (lambda () (and (org-agenda-ng--todo-p) (or (org-agen

Re: [O] Is there a way to get all agenda TODOs programmatically?

Nicolas Goaziou writes: Hi Nicolas, > I don't think the size of the functions matter much. Agenda is optimized > for single day view, so it is fast in this case because it only looks > for "interesting" headlines. However, this mechanism is terrible for > multi-days agendas: Agenda treats them a

Re: [O] Is there a way to get all agenda TODOs programmatically?

Hello, Adam Porter writes: > I have some more code you might find useful. I had an idea to take a > different approach with my org-agenda-ng code (not using org-element to > parse the whole buffer first), and it seems to be working well so far. Clearly, `org-element-parse-buffer' is not adequa

Re: [O] Is there a way to get all agenda TODOs programmatically?

Hello, Adam Porter writes: > There are some examples of attempts at better APIs (e.g. my PoC > org-agenda-ng code, Remy Honig's > , and some other people's > personal configs here and there), but I'm guessing they all suffer from > Emacs's function call ov

Re: [O] Is there a way to get all agenda TODOs programmatically?

Hi Marcin (and all), I have some more code you might find useful. I had an idea to take a different approach with my org-agenda-ng code (not using org-element to parse the whole buffer first), and it seems to be working well so far. The code is here: https://github.com/alphapapa/org-agenda-ng/tr

Re: [O] Is there a way to get all agenda TODOs programmatically?

Marcin Borkowski writes: > and thanks for your answer. I never thought about analyzing agenda > /output/ - that is quite clever! I still think it's a hack, and > I really regret that Org does not offer a programmer a better API for > agenda (and many other things) - there could be a lot of appl

Re: [O] Is there a way to get all agenda TODOs programmatically?

On 2018-01-01, at 00:37, Adam Porter wrote: > Marcin Borkowski writes: > >> Thanks again. I played around with this for some time, but there is one >> problem. The agenda has a lot of settings, and replicating them with >> org-map-entries turned out to be no fun. >> >> Is there a way to plug

Re: [O] Is there a way to get all agenda TODOs programmatically?

Marcin Borkowski writes: > Thanks again. I played around with this for some time, but there is one > problem. The agenda has a lot of settings, and replicating them with > org-map-entries turned out to be no fun. > > Is there a way to plug into the agenda generating functions somehow to > get a

Re: [O] Is there a way to get all agenda TODOs programmatically?

On 2017-10-07, at 18:54, Matt Lundin wrote: >>> Finally, if you want simply to gather the todo data programmatically for >>> further processing you can use the function org-map-entries. >> >> Thanks, that seems to be a good pointer. I'll check it out. > > I think something like this would gener

Re: [O] Is it possible to pass variable to variables of src block?

Hello, Xi Shen writes: > Hi Michael, > > Yes, I think this is a way to my previous question. But what I really want > to achieve is to loop through a list of server names and execute a script > on them. > > Say I have 20 different database server. How can I do a loop with each > server? interest

Re: [O] Is it possible to pass variable to variables of src block?

Hi David, One thing you can do is to make a code block, which will generate another code block, running your script with different arguments. Let me illustrate with a simple example: #+name: printecho #+BEGIN_SRC sh :var a=1 echo $a; #+END_SRC #+name: genscript #+BEGIN_SRC sh :var cmd="printec

Re: [O] Is it possible to pass variable to variables of src block?

Hi Michael, Yes, I think this is a way to my previous question. But what I really want to achieve is to loop through a list of server names and execute a script on them. Say I have 20 different database server. How can I do a loop with each server? Regards, David On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 5:34 P

Re: [O] Is it possible to pass variable to variables of src block?

Hello, Xi Shen writes: > Hi, > > http://orgmode.org/manual/var.html > > This wiki explains how to use variable inside a src block. But I wonder if > it is possible to specify variable to the variables in the src definition. > > E.g. for the sql src block, I want to execute a script on different

[O] Is it possible to pass variable to variables of src block?

Hi, http://orgmode.org/manual/var.html This wiki explains how to use variable inside a src block. But I wonder if it is possible to specify variable to the variables in the src definition. E.g. for the sql src block, I want to execute a script on different server. I want to define a variable for

Re: [O] Is it possible to sort checkboxes?

Hi, never mind. As so many other times (blush) I figured out the answer right after posting the question. I was trying with a test file like the following and with the org-sort (C-c ^) command. I assumed I had to issue the command in the TODO line, which tells me there is "Nothing to sort". Actual

[O] Is it possible to sort checkboxes?

Hi, lately I'm using checkboxes a lot. They are fine, but I tend to have items with many checkboxes in them. As I work on an item I check some of them as done C-c C-c, but since I have many checkboxes and I don't always work in them in order, I end up having many checkboxes around, some checked as

Re: [O] Is it possible for a TODO item not to be an outline item?

Hi Florian, Florian Beck writes: > On 08.10.2017 13:40, Angel de Vicente wrote: >> So basically I would like to have that TODO item but somehow without >> creating a new section. Is it possible? > > Use > > --- > bla bla bla > # TODO: fix installation > bla bla bla > --- >

Re: [O] Is it possible for a TODO item not to be an outline item?

On 08.10.2017 13:40, Angel de Vicente wrote: So basically I would like to have that TODO item but somehow without creating a new section. Is it possible? Use --- bla bla bla # TODO: fix installation bla bla bla --- and M-x org-occur-in-agenda-files (which is bound to

Re: [O] Is it possible for a TODO item not to be an outline item?

Hi, Marco Wahl writes: > Georgiy Tugai writes: > >> Inline tasks come to mind. Here's your example with inline tasks: >> The command to insert an inline task is 'org-inlinetask-insert-task'; I >> believe that there is no default binding. > > There is. In an Org file > > C-h w org-inlinet

Re: [O] Is it possible for a TODO item not to be an outline item?

Georgiy Tugai writes: > Inline tasks come to mind. Here's your example with inline tasks: > > , > | * Installation of PC X > | > | ** Hardware configuration > | blah,blah,blah, > | > | ** Software configuration > | I intall app x, no trouble > | > | I try to install app y, but no luck > |

Re: [O] Is it possible for a TODO item not to be an outline item?

Inline tasks come to mind. Here's your example with inline tasks: , | * Installation of PC X | | ** Hardware configuration | blah,blah,blah, | | ** Software configuration | I intall app x, no trouble | | I try to install app y, but no luck | *** TODO App Y is giving trouble, fix

[O] Is it possible for a TODO item not to be an outline item?

Hi, I'm starting to use org for notes, and I realize that I don't know how to create a TODO item but without it being an outline item. Sorry if this is not the proper terminology. Let me explain what I would like to have. Let's say I have a file where I want to keep details about a new machine ins

Re: [O] Is there a way to get all agenda TODOs programmatically?

Marcin Borkowski writes: > On 2017-10-07, at 16:20, Matt Lundin wrote: > >> Hi Marcin, >> >> Marcin Borkowski writes: >> >>> I'd like to get a list of all agenda TODOs, with titles and due dates. >>> Is there something ready in Org/contrib/blogosphere to help me? >> >> This functionality is bui

Re: [O] Is there a way to get all agenda TODOs programmatically?

On 2017-10-07, at 16:20, Matt Lundin wrote: > Hi Marcin, > > Marcin Borkowski writes: > >> I'd like to get a list of all agenda TODOs, with titles and due dates. >> Is there something ready in Org/contrib/blogosphere to help me? > > This functionality is built into org-mode. The simplest way to

Re: [O] Is there a way to get all agenda TODOs programmatically?

Hi Marcin, Marcin Borkowski writes: > I'd like to get a list of all agenda TODOs, with titles and due dates. > Is there something ready in Org/contrib/blogosphere to help me? This functionality is built into org-mode. The simplest way to get such a list is to use the agenda (specifically M-x or

[O] Is there a way to get all agenda TODOs programmatically?

Hi there, I'd like to get a list of all agenda TODOs, with titles and due dates. Is there something ready in Org/contrib/blogosphere to help me? The problem I'm trying to solve is to make some kind of a metric of how I'm doing with my TODO list, like "how many overdue tasks do I have", or even be

Re: [O] Is it possible to repeat tasks only a certain amount of times?

On Thursday, 14 Sep 2017 at 11:05, Göktuğ Kayaalp wrote: > It seems to me that my only option ATM is what Eric S Fraga pointed, > but that's rather tedious as things like lessons change during the > year (different classrooms, time changes). Funnily enough, it is for changes in lecture halls etc.

Re: [O] Is it possible to repeat tasks only a certain amount of times?

On 2017-09-13 20:58 +03, Jorge Morais Neto wrote: > How about a diary-style sexp entry, with org-class? That is, something > like ~<%%(org-class 2017 7 31 2018 3 23 1)>~. That example would appear > on the agenda on every Monday between 2017-07-31 and 2018-03-23. Thanks a lot, this in combinati

Re: [O] Is it possible to repeat tasks only a certain amount of times?

How about a diary-style sexp entry, with org-class? That is, something like ~<%%(org-class 2017 7 31 2018 3 23 1)>~. That example would appear on the agenda on every Monday between 2017-07-31 and 2018-03-23. Regards -- - I am Brazilian. I hope my English is correct and I welcome feedback - Pl

Re: [O] Is it possible to repeat tasks only a certain amount of times?

On Wednesday, 13 Sep 2017 at 14:01, Göktuğ Kayaalp wrote: > I have tried the following: > > <2017-09-18 Pzt 14:25-18:40 +1w>-- I think this is discussed in the FAQ on the org mode web site but, in any case, no, you cannot do what you want. You may wish to look at , | org-clone-subtree-with-t

[O] Is it possible to repeat tasks only a certain amount of times?

Hi, I have a task with the following timestamp: <2017-09-18 Pzt 14:25-18:40 +1w> which represents an event that's going to repeat every week during a certain period (it's not a TODO item). With this timestamp however in my agenda it repeats forever until when I'll finally archive it. Ideally I'

[O] Is it possible to use footnote style links in PDF export?

I have been exporting PDFs of my trees lately to print. I would like the exported PDFs to not include hot links but instead to use footnote style links. Is that possible? Ideally, I would like to be able to export these footnote style links directly to the print spool as a latex formatted document

Re: [O] is there an easier way to insert an internal link?

Hi John, org-moders, * John Kitchin [2017-08-24; 06:41]: > I don't think this is in org-mode, but something like > helm-org-in-buffer-headings has an action for doing something like that. Yupp, it's on "C-c l" and asks for the description. Thanks a lot, Gregor

Re: [O] is there an easier way to insert an internal link?

I don't think this is in org-mode, but something like helm-org-in-buffer-headings has an action for doing something like that. John --- Professor John Kitchin Doherty Hall A207F Department of Chemical Engineering Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 15213 412-

[O] is there an easier way to insert an internal link?

Der org-mode users, I'm in a big org-mode file and want to insert a link to a specific heading. Till now I go to that heading, do org-store-link, go back to the insert location and do org-insert-link. Isnt' there a way to say insert-internal-link-here, get a list of headings like refile targets,

Re: [O] Is doc/org-version.tex generation broken?

On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Kyle Meyer wrote: > Kyle Meyer writes: > [...] > Can you verify that the below change works on your system? > > Thanks. > > -- >8 -- > Subject: [PATCH] doc/Makefile: Use printf to generate org-version.tex > > * doc/Makefile (org-version.tex): Use printf instead

Re: [O] Is doc/org-version.tex generation broken?

Kyle Meyer writes: > Dale writes: [...] >> Is this something screwed up in my environment or are others seeing this as >> well? > > I'm guessing that I should rewrite the command in a more portable way. > Not sure what that is offhand. Can you verify that the below change works on your system

Re: [O] Is doc/org-version.tex generation broken?

Dale writes: > a8d007db15 starts generating doc/org-version.{tex,inc}, Unimportant to the rest of this issue, but that commit only started generating doc/org-version.tex. The generation of doc/org-version.inc wasn't modified. > but on my OS X system this ends up creating broken files with (I >

Re: [O] Is doc/org-version.tex generation broken?

\v is the text-mode equivalent of 'vee' or \check{o}. file a question/bug at gmake's home? http://github.com/renozao/pkgmaker/issues || Is this something screwed up in my environment or are others seeing this as well?

[O] Is doc/org-version.tex generation broken?

Hi! a8d007db15 starts generating doc/org-version.{tex,inc}, but on my OS X system this ends up creating broken files with (I believe) vertical tab characters in them. On HEAD this morning: $ make card [...] PDFLATEX=pdftex texi2pdf --batch --clean --expand orgcard.tex This is pdfTeX, Version 3.1

Re: [O] is it bad to have both org and org-plus-contrib installed?

ntrib-and-org-with-require-or-use-package ;; .. etc ) YMMV, Malcolm From: Emacs-orgmode [mailto:emacs-orgmode-bounces+mec=stowers@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Kaushal Modi Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 5:39 PM To: Thomas S. Dye ; Alan Schmitt Cc: emacs-orgmode Subject: Re: [O] is it bad to have

Re: [O] is it bad to have both org and org-plus-contrib installed?

Hi all, I just discovered a bug in this advice that I suggested earlier in this thread.. I needed to fix the order of packages in the new-ret list that is returned. The bug was that the order of pkgs in new-ret was flipped compared to that in orig-ret.. so I needed to flip it back using reverse.

Re: [O] Is it possible to "properly" indent inside latex fragments?

Nicolas Goaziou writes on Fri 3 Mar 2017 12:26: > This is a new feature, so it is in development branch only, i.e., > Org 9.1, yet to be released. OK, thanks for the clarification. Regards -- EOST (École et Observatoire des Sciences de la Terre) IPG (Institut de Physique du Globe) | alain.co

Re: [O] Is it possible to "properly" indent inside latex fragments?

Hello, alain.coch...@unistra.fr writes: > Nicolas Goaziou writes on Wed 1 Feb 2017 21:34: > > > For the record, i implemented `org-edit-latex-environment'. > > > > Basically, it means you can edit the LaTeX code in a new buffer, using > > latex-mode, with C-c ' [...] > > > Nicolas Goaziou

Re: [O] Is it possible to "properly" indent inside latex fragments?

Nicolas Goaziou writes on Wed 1 Feb 2017 21:34: > For the record, i implemented `org-edit-latex-environment'. > > Basically, it means you can edit the LaTeX code in a new buffer, using > latex-mode, with C-c ' [...] Nicolas Goaziou writes on Fri 3 Feb 2017 22:04: > alain.coch...@unist

Re: [O] Is `head-include-scripts' flag reachable from OPTIONS?

On 15 Feb 2017, 13:43:34 -0500 Nick Dokos wrote: > #+BIND: org-html-head-include-scripts nil > > perhaps? Ah, yes. This works much better than what I had before, which was to put the following lines at the bottom of my source file. #+BEGIN_COMMENT Local Variables: eval: (setq org-html-head-incl

Re: [O] Is `head-include-scripts' flag reachable from OPTIONS?

r...@tamos.net writes: > When I export to html, it puts a javascript

[O] Is `head-include-scripts' flag reachable from OPTIONS?

When I export to html, it puts a javascript

Re: [O] Is it possible to "properly" indent inside latex fragments?

Nicolas Goaziou writes on Fri 3 Feb 2017 22:04: > > I have one (minor) question/concern, though: will the indentation > > survive an 'M-x indent-region' or 'M-x org-indent-region'? > > It should, now. Thank you for the heads up. Great, thanks again for your promptness; I can confess it now:

Re: [O] Is it possible to "properly" indent inside latex fragments?

Hello, alain.coch...@unistra.fr writes: > Great, thanks a lot. Looking forward to using it (I guess it will be > available in the version following 9.0.4?). Indeed. > I have one (minor) question/concern, though: will the indentation > survive an 'M-x indent-region' or 'M-x org-indent-region'?

Re: [O] Is it possible to "properly" indent inside latex fragments?

Nicolas Goaziou writes on Wed 1 Feb 2017 21:34: > Hello, > > alain.coch...@unistra.fr writes: > > > Charles C. Berry writes on Mon 23 Jan 2017 08:44: > > > > > With export blocks you can get close. > > > > > > If you type =C-c '= inside the following export block, you will get the

Re: [O] Is it possible to "properly" indent inside latex fragments?

Hello, alain.coch...@unistra.fr writes: > Charles C. Berry writes on Mon 23 Jan 2017 08:44: > > > With export blocks you can get close. > > > > If you type =C-c '= inside the following export block, you will get the > > contents in a latex buffer. Then indentation and other LATEX/P mode >

Re: [O] Is it possible to "properly" indent inside latex fragments?

Charles C. Berry writes on Mon 23 Jan 2017 08:44: > With export blocks you can get close. > > If you type =C-c '= inside the following export block, you will get the > contents in a latex buffer. Then indentation and other LATEX/P mode > operations are available. When you exit with another

[O] Is there something like ~org-blank-after-new-entry~ for org mode headings?

Hi All, There is ~org-blank-before-new-entry~ to insert a blank line before a new entry. But is there a similar variable for adding a blank line after a new entry? It would be useful when inserting an entry between entries. I've asked the question on stackexchange

Re: [O] is it bad to have both org and org-plus-contrib installed?

Alan Schmitt writes: > Thank you for the suggestion, but I use Spacemacs, which in turn uses > paradox. > > Why couldn't there be an org-contrib package, depending on org? So that > way org would not be duplicated in two packages. I've run into the same problem with Spacemacs and would welcome a

Re: [O] is it bad to have both org and org-plus-contrib installed?

On 2017-01-24 12:14, Kaushal Modi writes: > I don't recall facing the issue like yours when org gets > auto-installed as dependency. But I found it annoying to wait for org > to get installed as dependency magically when some package having that > as dependency got updated. So I would delete it m

Re: [O] is it bad to have both org and org-plus-contrib installed?

I don't recall facing the issue like yours when org gets auto-installed as dependency. But I found it annoying to wait for org to get installed as dependency magically when some package having that as dependency got updated. So I would delete it manually, some package would get updated, and it woul

[O] is it bad to have both org and org-plus-contrib installed?

Hello, I recently had one of those transient problems that go away when reinstalling org (the one where no code block can be executed). As I was doing so, I noticed that I had both org and org-plus-contrib installed, visibly because some packages depend on org. Is this a bad thing? And is there a

Re: [O] Is it possible to "properly" indent inside latex fragments?

On Mon, 23 Jan 2017, alain.coch...@unistra.fr wrote: Hello. This is what I obtain if I type each line followed by and then in an org file: * foo \begin{displaymath} \begin{split} a &= b \\ &+c \end{split} \end{displaymath} If I highlight everything and use 'M-x indent-region' or 'M-x

[O] Is it possible to "properly" indent inside latex fragments?

Hello. This is what I obtain if I type each line followed by and then in an org file: * foo \begin{displaymath} \begin{split} a &= b \\ &+c \end{split} \end{displaymath} If I highlight everything and use 'M-x indent-region' or 'M-x org-indent-region', it does not change. Inst

Re: [O] Is there way to put the inactive date into a table?

Hello, Young-whan writes: > | [2017-01-20 Fri] | <2017-01-30 Mon> | > > #+TBLFM: @2$1=@1$1+10 > > I put a inactive date at @1$1 and I want @2$1 would have +10 days from the > date, and want it to be inactive date, but it always shows active calendar > date form. > > Is there a way to make it

Re: [O] Is there way to put the inactive date into a table?

Young-whan writes: >   | [2017-01-20 Fri] | >   | <2017-01-30 Mon> | >   #+TBLFM: @2$1=@1$1+10 > > I put a inactive date at @1$1 and I want @2$1 would have +10 days from the > date, and want it to be > inactive date, but it always shows active calendar date form. > > Is there a way to make it in

[O] Is there way to put the inactive date into a table?

| [2017-01-20 Fri] | | <2017-01-30 Mon> | #+TBLFM: @2$1=@1$1+10 I put a inactive date at @1$1 and I want @2$1 would have +10 days from the date, and want it to be inactive date, but it always shows active calendar date form. Is there a way to make it inactive date?

Re: [O] Is there a org-babel-map-src-blocks but for tables?

Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Pierre-Henry Frohring writes: > >> Probably good to put that in the doc (http://orgmode.org/org.html)! > > Not sure where it could fit, tho. > The mapping API section perhaps? -- Nick

  1   2   3   4   >