Re: [O] Irrelevant src blocks can break noweb expansion

2017-12-12 Thread Berry, Charles
> On Dec 11, 2017, at 11:42 PM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > >> >> The irrelevant, unnamed, empty src block its consulted via >> org-babel-get-src-block-info. > > When? AFAICT, the second block doesn't contain any Noweb reference, so > there is nothing to consult in the first place. IOW, something

Re: [O] Irrelevant src blocks can break noweb expansion

2017-12-11 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, "Berry, Charles" writes: > I used to avoid this by `(setq org-babel-use-quick-and-dirty-noweb-expansion > t)'. > > This illustrates the issue: > > #+begin_src org > > ,* abc > > ,#+begin_src R :comment (message "running on empty") > > ,#+end_src > > ,#+begin_src R :noweb yes >

[O] Irrelevant src blocks can break noweb expansion

2017-12-10 Thread Berry, Charles
I used to avoid this by `(setq org-babel-use-quick-and-dirty-noweb-expansion t)'. This illustrates the issue: #+begin_src org ,* abc ,#+begin_src R :comment (message "running on empty") ,#+end_src ,#+begin_src R :noweb yes 1 ,#+end_src #+end_src The irrelevant, unnamed, empty