Re: [O] IDE tools for maintaining Emacs Lisp programs (Org in particular)

2012-04-21 Thread Eric Schulte
Jambunathan K writes: > Jambunathan K writes: > >> For all practical purposes, I find this be sufficient. >> >> (global-set-key (kbd "C-c f") >> (lambda () >>(interactive) >>(require 'finder) >>(let ((thing (intern (thing-at-point 'sym

Re: [O] IDE tools for maintaining Emacs Lisp programs (Org in particular)

2012-04-20 Thread Jambunathan K
Jambunathan K writes: > For all practical purposes, I find this be sufficient. > > (global-set-key (kbd "C-c f") > (lambda () > (interactive) > (require 'finder) > (let ((thing (intern (thing-at-point 'symbol > (i

Re: [O] IDE tools for maintaining Emacs Lisp programs (Org in particular)

2012-04-20 Thread Jambunathan K
For all practical purposes, I find this be sufficient. (global-set-key (kbd "C-c f") (lambda () (interactive) (require 'finder) (let ((thing (intern (thing-at-point 'symbol (if (functionp thing)

Re: [O] IDE tools for maintaining Emacs Lisp programs (Org in particular)

2012-04-20 Thread Bastien
Hi Sébastien, "Sebastien Vauban" writes: > This is a bit OT, but I'd be interested by learning how to get a better > environment for editing ELisp code. > > Currently, the only friends I have are ElDoc and C-h f/v for navigation to > symbol definitions. This is rather primitive, isn't it? Wel

[O] IDE tools for maintaining Emacs Lisp programs (Org in particular)

2012-04-20 Thread Sebastien Vauban
Hello, This is a bit OT, but I'd be interested by learning how to get a better environment for editing ELisp code. Currently, the only friends I have are ElDoc and C-h f/v for navigation to symbol definitions. This is rather primitive, isn't it? When I see what CEDET and ECB seem to offer -- tho