Vikas Rawal writes:
>> >> You also stated that the main reason for your current behavior
>> >> is to delay Org 8.0, to create chaos and to annoy me.
>> >
>> > Yes.
>> >
>>
>> I would suggest that further emails from Jambunathan be ignored. The
>> more effort expended "reasoning" with him, the mo
> >> You also stated that the main reason for your current behavior
> >> is to delay Org 8.0, to create chaos and to annoy me.
> >
> > Yes.
> >
>
> I would suggest that further emails from Jambunathan be ignored. The
> more effort expended "reasoning" with him, the more time wasted by
> members o
> From: Jambunathan K
> Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
> Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 23:21:22 +0530
>
> Eli Zaretskii writes:
>
> >> From: Jambunathan K
> >> Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2013 14:12:36 +0530
> >>
> >> I have terminated my copyright assignment to Emacs (or atleast notified
> >> the copyright desk).
Eli Zaretskii writes:
>> From: Jambunathan K
>> Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2013 14:12:36 +0530
>>
>> I have terminated my copyright assignment to Emacs (or atleast notified
>> the copyright desk).
>
> I'm not sure we should believe this statement. As of a few minutes
> ago, your assignment for Emacs st
> From: Jambunathan K
> Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2013 14:12:36 +0530
>
> I have terminated my copyright assignment to Emacs (or atleast notified
> the copyright desk).
I'm not sure we should believe this statement. As of a few minutes
ago, your assignment for Emacs still appears on file in FSF records
John Hendy writes:
> With respect to Org staying up to date on these developments, it
> probably *is* a good idea to know how Emacs/FSF responds. Should the
> rights be granted back to Jambunathan, Org should behave accordingly.
Exceedingly unlikely, I think. There is no legal case, the FSF takes
Jambunathan K writes:
>> You also stated that the main reason for your current behavior
>> is to delay Org 8.0, to create chaos and to annoy me.
>
> Yes.
>
I would suggest that further emails from Jambunathan be ignored. The
more effort expended "reasoning" with him, the more time wasted by
mem
Carsten Dominik writes:
> Org-mode is not a company.
I am not taking about Orgmode per-se. I am talking about Orgmode in so
as far as it is part of Emacs, the copy rights to which are owned and
enforced by FSF.
Much of my argument relate to policies of Emacs.
FSF *is* an organization. If on
> It is known that your intent has now changed,
Correct.
> but the original intent was plain to you and others
Yes.
> and has caused others to rely on the code, to add and invest.
Code is GPL.
Nicolas Goaziou has already grown in respect by committing a fix to the
ODT exporter in a manner th
Jambunathan,
I am not entering a discussion here, based on some wildly
constructed examples. What I am doing is countering the
impression you are lately trying to make, that these files
were never intended for release and Emacs. You are trying
to imply this by insisting that they were "in contri
> You also stated that the main reason for your current behavior
> is to delay Org 8.0, to create chaos and to annoy me.
Yes.
> I'm fine with releasing ox-html.el and ox-odt.el in Org 8.0.
By releasing Org-8.0 your "responsibilities" will only increase, not
decrease. You will be obliged to pur
Jambunathan K writes:
> For the sake of record, I haven't authorized Bastien to move the
> ox-html.el and ox-odt.el out of the ./contrib/lisp directory in to the
> main ./lisp/ directory. He didn't seek my permissions to move the file
> away from contrib/lisp in to lisp/.
1. Nicolas announced t
Carsten
> When this code first entered the Org-mode repository, it was not in
> contrib/. The code entered in EXPERIMENTAL/. Both files where marked
> "Copyright (C) 2011-2012 FSF" and "Copyright (C) 2010-2012 FSF" from
> the first moment they entered into the repository, in agreement with
> Ja
Am 03.04.2013 00:25, schrieb John Hendy:
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Christian Moe wrote:
Jambunathan,
If you're leaving the Org-mode community, I'd prefer to remember you
with gratitude for leaving us the excellent ODT exporter. Please stop
diminishing your legacy with this quasi-legal w
Hi,
For the record created by this mailing list thread, I would like to correct two
mistakes:
On 2.4.2013, at 10:42, Jambunathan K wrote:
>
> I have terminated my copyright assignment to Emacs (or atleast notified
> the copyright desk).
>
> For the sake of record, I haven't authorized Bastie
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Christian Moe wrote:
>
> Jambunathan,
>
> If you're leaving the Org-mode community, I'd prefer to remember you
> with gratitude for leaving us the excellent ODT exporter. Please stop
> diminishing your legacy with this quasi-legal wrangling.
>
> As a user, I have gr
Jambunathan,
If you're leaving the Org-mode community, I'd prefer to remember you
with gratitude for leaving us the excellent ODT exporter. Please stop
diminishing your legacy with this quasi-legal wrangling.
As a user, I have greatly appreciated both your code contributions and
your patient hel
I have terminated my copyright assignment to Emacs (or atleast notified
the copyright desk).
For the sake of record, I haven't authorized Bastien to move the
ox-html.el and ox-odt.el out of the ./contrib/lisp directory in to the
main ./lisp/ directory. He didn't seek my permissions to move the f
18 matches
Mail list logo
